Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philip Schär
dblp:354/4606
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Parallel Affine Transformation Tuning of Markov Chain Monte Carlo · ICML 2024 Gibbsian Polar Slice Sampling · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
adaptive MCMC |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Parallel Affine Transformation Tuning of Markov Chain Monte Carlo · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
slice sampling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gibbsian Polar Slice Sampling · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov chain monte carlo · 1.4gibbsian polar slice sampling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Parallel Affine Transformation Tuning of Markov Chain Monte CarloabstractThe performance of Markov chain Monte Carlo samplers strongly depends on the properties of the target distribution such as its covariance structure, the location of its probability mass and its tail behavior. We explore the use of bijective affine transformations of the sample space to improve the properties of the target distribution and thereby the performance of samplers running in the transformed space. In particular, we propose a flexible and user-friendly scheme for adaptively learning the affine transformation during sampling. Moreover, the combination of our scheme with Gibbsian polar slice sampling is shown to produce samples of high quality at comparatively low computational cost in several settings based on real-world data. Philip Schär, Michael Habeck, Daniel Rudolf |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Gibbsian Polar Slice SamplingabstractPolar slice sampling (Roberts & Rosenthal, 2002) is a Markov chain approach for approximate sampling of distributions that is difficult, if not impossible, to implement efficiently, but behaves provably well with respect to the dimension. By updating the directional and radial components of chain iterates separately, we obtain a family of samplers that mimic polar slice sampling, and yet can be implemented efficiently. Numerical experiments in a variety of settings indicate that our proposed algorithm outperforms the two most closely related approaches, elliptical slice sampling (Murray et al., 2010) and hit-and-run uniform slice sampling (MacKay, 2003). We prove the well-definedness and convergence of our methods under suitable assumptions on the target distribution. Philip Schär, Michael Habeck, Daniel Rudolf |
ICML | 1 |