Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuanbiao Lin
dblp:354/5355
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0055-0320ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › aspect-based sentiment analysis
aspect-level sentiment classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CausalABSC: Causal Inference for Aspect Debiasing in Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CausalABSC: Causal Inference for Aspect Debiasing in Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
causal inference · 0.8causal graph · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | CausalABSC: Causal Inference for Aspect Debiasing in Aspect-Based Sentiment ClassificationabstractAs the primary subtask of sentiment analysis, aspect-based sentiment classification (ABSC) aims to predict the sentiment polarity for a given aspect. While recent deep neural models for ABSC have shown good performance, their robustness is limited due to their reliance on spurious correlations between aspects and sentiment. Specifically, most existing models tend to assign the most frequent sentiment label to a certain aspect in different sentences, or assume different aspects in the same sentence to have the same sentiment polarity, which is vulnerable due to the aspect biases. In this paper, we propose a causal graph to identify and analyze the causal relationships among treatment variables (e.g., aspect, sentence), intermediate variables (e.g., aspect-aware content), and outcome variables (e.g., sentiment polarity) for ABSC. To address the issue of spurious relationships that mislead sentiment polarity prediction, we introduce a novel causal inference framework called CausalABSC. CausalABSC is model agnostic, allowing integration into existing methods. We conduct extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets, which demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of CausalABSC and its effectiveness in debiasing. Jie Zhou 0015, Yuanbiao Lin, Qin Chen 0001, Qi Zhang 0001, Xuanjing Huang 0001, Liang He 0001 |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 2 |