Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mara Finkelstein

dblp:354/9098 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Language models and text generation · 48% Machine translation · 38% Efficient and distributed learning · 11%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation
1.922026
MQM Re-Annotation: A Technique for Collaborative Evaluation of Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2026
From Jack of All Trades to Master of One: Specializing LLM-based Autoraters to a Test Set · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
1.622025
Learning from others' mistakes: Finetuning machine translation models with span-level error annotations · ICML 2025
Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding
1.522024
Efficient Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Low-Rank Matrix Completion Algorithms · NeurIPS 2024
MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding Methods · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
minimum bayes risk decoding
1.522024
Efficient Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Low-Rank Matrix Completion Algorithms · NeurIPS 2024
MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding Methods · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text evaluation
human evaluation
1.012026
MQM Re-Annotation: A Technique for Collaborative Evaluation of Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › machine translation evaluation
automatic evaluation metrics
0.912025
From Jack of All Trades to Master of One: Specializing LLM-based Autoraters to a Test Set · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.912025
From Jack of All Trades to Master of One: Specializing LLM-based Autoraters to a Test Set · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
efficient decoding
0.812024
Efficient Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Low-Rank Matrix Completion Algorithms · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
efficient generation
0.812024
Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.812024
MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding Methods · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › machine translation evaluation
translation quality estimation
0.812024
Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
annotation schemes
0.312026
MQM Re-Annotation: A Technique for Collaborative Evaluation of Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

MQM annotation · 1.0training with annotations · 0.9large language model · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9quality estimation reranking · 0.8quality estimation · 0.8multi-task learning · 0.8minimum bayes risk decoding · 0.8knowledge distillation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 MQM Re-Annotation: A Technique for Collaborative Evaluation of Machine Translation
abstract
Parker Riley, Daniel Deutsch, Mara Finkelstein, Colten DiIanni, Juraj Juraska, Markus Freitag. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Parker Riley, Daniel Deutsch, Mara Finkelstein, Colten DiIanni, Juraj Juraska, Markus Freitag
ACL (1)3
2025 From Jack of All Trades to Master of One: Specializing LLM-based Autoraters to a Test Set
abstract
As LLMs continue to become more powerful and versatile, human evaluation has become intractable at scale and reliance on automatic metrics has become the norm. Recently, it has been shown that LLMs are themselves state-of-the-art evaluators for many tasks. These *Autoraters* are typically designed so that they generalize to new systems *and* test sets. In practice, however, evaluation is performed on a small set of fixed, canonical test sets, which are carefully curated to measure the capabilities of interest and are not changed frequently. In this work, we design a method which specializes a prompted Autorater to a given test set, by leveraging historical ratings on the test set to construct in-context learning (ICL) examples. We evaluate our *Specialist* method on the task of fine-grained machine translation evaluation, and show that it dramatically outperforms the state-of-the-art XCOMET metric by 54% and 119% on the WMT'23 and WMT'24 test sets, respectively. We perform extensive analyses to understand the representations learned by our Specialist metrics, and how variability in rater behavior affects their performance. We also verify the generalizability and robustness of our Specialist method across different numbers of ICL examples, LLM backbones, systems to evaluate, and evaluation tasks.
Mara Finkelstein, Daniel Deutsch, Parker Riley, Juraj Juraska, Geza Kovacs, Markus Freitag
ICML1
2025 Learning from others' mistakes: Finetuning machine translation models with span-level error annotations
abstract
Despite growing interest in incorporating feedback to improve language models, most efforts focus only on sequence-level annotations. In this work, we explore the potential of utilizing fine-grained span-level annotations from offline datasets to improve model quality. We develop a simple finetuning algorithm, called Training with Annotations (TWA), to directly train machine translation models on such annotated data. TWA utilizes targeted span-level error information while also flexibly learning what to penalize within a span. Moreover, TWA considers the overall trajectory of a sequence when deciding which non-error spans to utilize as positive signals. Experiments on English-German and Chinese-English machine translation show that TWA outperforms baselines such as supervised finetuning on sequences filtered for quality and Direct Preference Optimization on pairs constructed from the same data.
Lily H. Zhang, Hamid Dadkhahi, Mara Finkelstein, Firas Trabelsi, Jiaming Luo, Markus Freitag
ICML3
2024 Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model
abstract
Christian Tomani, David Vilar, Markus Freitag, Colin Cherry, Subhajit Naskar, Mara Finkelstein, Xavier Garcia, Daniel Cremers. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Christian Tomani, David Vilar, Markus Freitag, Colin Cherry, Subhajit Naskar, Mara Finkelstein, Xavier Garcia, Daniel Cremers
ACL (1)6
2024 MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding Methods
abstract
Recent research in decoding methods for Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks has shown that MAP decoding is not optimal, because model probabilities do not always align with human preferences. Stronger decoding methods, including Quality Estimation (QE) reranking and Minimum Bayes' Risk (MBR) decoding, have since been proposed to mitigate the model-perplexity-vs-quality mismatch. While these decoding methods achieve state-of-the-art performance, they are prohibitively expensive to compute. In this work, we propose MBR finetuning and QE finetuning, which distill the quality gains from these decoding methods at training time, while using an efficient decoding algorithm at inference time. Using the canonical NLG task of Neural Machine Translation (NMT), we show that even with self-training, these finetuning methods significantly outperform the base model. Moreover, when using an external LLM as a teacher model, these finetuning methods outperform finetuning on human-generated references. These findings suggest new ways to leverage monolingual data to achieve improvements in model quality that are on par with, or even exceed, improvements from human-curated data, while maintaining maximum efficiency during decoding.
Mara Finkelstein, Markus Freitag
ICLR1
2024 Efficient Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Low-Rank Matrix Completion Algorithms
abstract
Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding is a powerful decoding strategy widely used for text generation tasks but its quadratic computational complexity limits its practical application. This paper presents a novel approach for approximating MBR decoding using matrix completion techniques, focusing on a machine translation task. We formulate MBR decoding as a matrix completion problem, where the utility metric scores between candidate hypotheses and reference translations form a low-rank matrix. First we empirically show that the scores matrices indeed have a low-rank structure. Then we exploit this by only computing a random subset of the scores and efficiently recover the missing entries in the matrix by applying the Alternating Least Squares (ALS) algorithm, thereby enabling fast approximation of the MBR decoding process. Our experimental results on machine translation tasks demonstrate that the proposed method requires 1/16 utility metric computations compared to the vanilla MBR decoding while achieving equal translation quality measured by COMET on the WMT22 dataset (en<>de, en<>ru). We also benchmark our method against other approximation methods and we show significant gains in quality.
Firas Trabelsi, David Vilar, Mara Finkelstein, Markus Freitag
NeurIPS3