Since the launch of the Sentinel-2 (S2) satellites, many ML models have used the data for diverse applications. The scene classification layer (SCL) inside the S2 product provides rich information for training, such as filtering images with high cloud coverage. However, there is more potential in this. We propose a technique to assess the clean optical coverage of a region, expressed by a SITS and calculated with the S2-based SCL data. With a manual threshold and specific labels in the SCL, the proposed technique assigns a percentage of spatial and temporal coverage across the time series and a high/low assessment. By evaluating the AI4EO challenge for Enhanced Agriculture, we show that the assessment is correlated to the predictive results of ML models. The classification results in a region with low spatial and temporal coverage is worse than in a region with high coverage. Finally, we applied the technique across all continents of the global dataset LandCoverNet.

Accurate and reliable crop yield prediction is a complex task. The yield of a crop depends on a variety of factors whose accurate measurement and modeling is challenging. At the same time, reliable yield prediction is highly desirable for farmers to optimize crop production. In this paper, we introduce a modeling based on remote sensing data and Machine Learning models evaluated on a large-scale dataset to address the challenge of an operational crop yield estimation and forecasting on field and subfield level. With our approach, we aim towards a global yield modeling based on Machine Learning models which operates across crop types without the need for crop-specific modeling. We demonstrate that our approach learns to map in-field variability for all studied crop types. Overall, the predictions have an error (RRMSE) of around 15% and an R2value of 0.77 at field level.

Numerous remote sensing applications rely on temporal satellite data, and Deep learning models are increasingly being used for such tasks. Nevertheless, these models operate as black boxes, lacking transparency and understandability. We address this gap by using explainable AI on an agricultural task. Specifically, we trained a recurrent neural network on individual pixels from multispectral time-series of Sentinel-2 satellite images to predict crop yield. We then applied nine feature attribution methods on a sample of the dataset and computed the spectral and temporal contributions to the final individual predictions. The aggregated results were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Results suggest that LIME and Shapley sampling value methods performed best on the quantitative scores, followed by GradientShap. Most backpropagation-based techniques had highly inconsistent scores across the explained data points. Finally, to guide remote sensing practitioners in using Explainable AI on similar datasets, we further discuss some selection criteria to be considered.

We introduce a simple yet effective early fusion method for crop yield prediction that handles multiple input modalities with different temporal and spatial resolutions. We use high-resolution crop yield maps as ground truth data to train crop and machine learning model agnostic methods at the sub-field level. We use Sentinel-2 satellite imagery as the primary modality for input data with other complementary modalities, including weather, soil, and DEM data. The proposed method uses input modalities available with global coverage, making the framework globally scalable. We explicitly highlight the importance of input modalities for crop yield prediction and emphasize that the best-performing combination of input modalities depends on region, crop, and chosen model.

Modern combine harvesters can collect geo-located real-time yield measurement while harvesting. This data can be used to train Machine Learning models that predict the yield at sub-field level based on remote sensing input data. The performance of these models is, however, highly dependent on the quality of the yield data. It is therefore important to develop automatic cleaning techniques to correct for common errors in combine harvester yield maps. In this work, we compare different combinations of data cleaning techniques by evaluating their impact on the yield-prediction model performance at field and sub-field level. Our findings indicate that basic cleaning techniques such as absolute thresholds are sufficient at the field level, whereas the performance at the sub-field level is enhanced through the utilization of more intricate statistical cleaning methods.