Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zeyu Gan
dblp:355/1832
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-4838-3116ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 42% Learning theory · 18% Learning paradigms · 17% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
class distribution mismatch |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Semi-Supervised Learning Under Class Distribution Mismatch · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
excess risk analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Semi-Supervised Learning Under Class Distribution Mismatch · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Synthetic Data in LLM Post-Training: A Reverse-Bottleneck Perspective · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
multi-step reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking External Slow-Thinking: From Snowball Errors to Probability of Correct Reasoning · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
post-training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Synthetic Data in LLM Post-Training: A Reverse-Bottleneck Perspective · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models › reasoning evaluation
reasoning error analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking External Slow-Thinking: From Snowball Errors to Probability of Correct Reasoning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Semi-Supervised Learning Under Class Distribution Mismatch · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
synthetic data |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Synthetic Data in LLM Post-Training: A Reverse-Bottleneck Perspective · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
test-time scaling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking External Slow-Thinking: From Snowball Errors to Probability of Correct Reasoning · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Superclass Learning with Representation Enhancement · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Synthetic Data in LLM Post-Training: A Reverse-Bottleneck Perspective · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Superclass Learning with Representation Enhancement · CVPR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pseudo-labeling · 0.9mutual information · 0.9information theory · 0.9bi-objective optimization · 0.9self-attention · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Synthetic Data in LLM Post-Training: A Reverse-Bottleneck PerspectiveabstractSynthetic data has become a pivotal resource in post-training tasks for large language models (LLMs) due to the scarcity of high-quality, specific data. While various methods have been developed to generate synthetic data, there remains a discernible gap between the practical effects of synthetic data and our theoretical comprehension. To address this challenge, we commence by presenting a detailed modeling of the prevalent synthetic data generation process. Building upon this modeling, we demonstrate that the generalization capability of the post-trained model is critically determined by the information gain derived from the generative model, as analyzed from a novel reverse-bottleneck perspective. Moreover, we introduce the concept of Generalization Gain via Mutual Information (GGMI) and elucidate the relationship between generalization gain and information gain. This analysis serves as a theoretical foundation for synthetic data generation and further highlights its connection with the generalization capability of post-trained models, offering an understanding about the design of synthetic data generation techniques and the optimization of the post-training process. We open-source our code at https://github.com/ZyGan1999/Towards-a-Theoretical-Understanding-of-Synthetic-Data-in-LLM-Post-Training. Zeyu Gan, Yong Liu 0018 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Rethinking External Slow-Thinking: From Snowball Errors to Probability of Correct ReasoningabstractTest-time scaling, which is also often referred to as slow-thinking, has been demonstrated to enhance multi-step reasoning in large language models (LLMs). However, despite its widespread utilization, the mechanisms underlying slow-thinking methods remain poorly understood. This paper explores the mechanisms of external slow-thinking from a theoretical standpoint. We begin by examining the snowball error effect within the LLM reasoning process and connect it to the likelihood of correct reasoning using information theory. Building on this, we show that external slow-thinking methods can be interpreted as strategies to mitigate the error probability. We further provide a comparative analysis of popular external slow-thinking approaches, ranging from simple to complex, highlighting their differences and interrelationships. Our findings suggest that the efficacy of these methods is not primarily determined by the specific framework employed, and that expanding the search scope or the model’s internal reasoning capacity may yield more sustained improvements in the long term. We open-source our code at https://github.com/ZyGan1999/Snowball-Errors-and-Probability. Zeyu Gan, Yun Liao, Yong Liu 0018 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Semi-Supervised Learning Under Class Distribution MismatchabstractSemi-supervised learning (SSL) confronts a formidable challenge under class distribution mismatch, wherein unlabeled data contain numerous categories absent in the labeled dataset. Traditional SSL methods undergo performance deterioration in such mismatch scenarios due to the invasion of those instances from unknown categories. Despite some technical efforts to enhance SSL by mitigating the invasion, the profound theoretical analysis of SSL under class distribution mismatch is still under study. Accordingly, in this work, we propose Bi-Objective Optimization Mechanism (BOOM) to theoretically analyze the excess risk between the empirical optimal solution and the population-level optimal solution. Specifically, BOOM reveals that the SSL error is the essential contributor behind excess risk, resulting from both the pseudo-labeling error and invasion error. Meanwhile, BOOM unveils that the optimization objectives of SSL under mismatch are binary: high-quality pseudo-labels and adaptive weights on the unlabeled instances, which contribute to alleviating the pseudo-labeling error and the invasion error, respectively. Moreover, BOOM explicitly discovers the fundamental factors crucial for optimizing the bi-objectives, guided by which an approach is then proposed as a strong baseline for SSL under mismatch. Extensive experiments on benchmark and real datasets confirm the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm. Pan Du 0002, Suyun Zhao, Puhui Tan, Zisen Sheng, Zeyu Gan, Hong Chen 0001, Cuiping Li 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 5 |
| 2023 | Superclass Learning with Representation EnhancementabstractIn many real scenarios, data are often divided into a handful of artificial super categories in terms of expert knowledge rather than the representations of images. Concretely, a superclass may contain massive and various raw categories, such as refuse sorting. Due to the lack of common semantic features, the existing classification techniques are intractable to recognize superclass without raw class labels, thus they suffer severe performance damage or require huge annotation costs. To narrow this gap, this paper proposes a superclass learning framework, called SuperClass Learning with Representation Enhancement(SCLRE), to recognize super categories by leveraging enhanced representation. Specifically, by exploiting the self-attention technique across the batch, SCLRE collapses the boundaries of those raw categories and enhances the representation of each superclass. On the enhanced representation space, a superclassaware decision boundary is then reconstructed. Theoretically, we prove that by leveraging attention techniques the generalization error of SCLRE can be bounded under superclass scenarios. Experimentally, extensive results demonstrate that SCLRE outperforms the baseline and other contrastive-based methods on CIFAR-100 datasets and four high-resolution datasets. Zeyu Gan, Suyun Zhao, Jinlong Kang, Liyuan Shang, Hong Chen 0001, Cuiping Li 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |