Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Laura Cabra-Acela

dblp:355/2118 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0000-0121-8560ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 62% Information retrieval · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › domain-specific recommendation
software engineering recommender systems
0.712023
On Using Information Retrieval to Recommend Machine Learning Good Practices for Software Engineers · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models › probabilistic retrieval model
BM25
0.212023
On Using Information Retrieval to Recommend Machine Learning Good Practices for Software Engineers · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2023
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.212023
On Using Information Retrieval to Recommend Machine Learning Good Practices for Software Engineers · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.7BM25 · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 On Using Information Retrieval to Recommend Machine Learning Good Practices for Software Engineers
abstract
Machine learning (ML) is nowadays widely used for different purposes and with several disciplines. From self-driving cars to automated medical diagnosis, machine learning models extensively support users’ daily activities, and software engineering tasks are no exception. Not embracing good ML practices may lead to pitfalls that hinder the performance of an ML system and potentially lead to unexpected results. Despite the existence of documentation and literature about ML best practices, many non-ML experts turn towards gray literature like blogs and Q&A systems when looking for help and guidance when implementing ML systems. To better aid users in distilling relevant knowledge from such sources, we propose a recommender system that recommends ML practices based on the user’s context. As a first step in creating a recommender system for machine learning practices, we implemented Idaka. A tool that provides two different approaches for retrieving/generating ML best practices: i) an information retrieval (IR) engine and ii) a large language model. The IR-engine uses BM25 as the algorithm for retrieving the practices, and a large language model, in our case Alpaca. The platform has been designed to allow comparative studies of best practices retrieval tools. Idaka is publicly available at GitHub: https://bit.ly/idaka. Video: https://youtu.be/cEb-AhIPxnM
Laura Cabra-Acela, Anamaria Mojica-Hanke, Mario Linares-Vásquez, Steffen Herbold
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE1