VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas Tagliapietra
dblp:356/2278
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Causal Structure Learning for Dynamical Systems with Theoretical Score Analysis · AAAI 2026 Exact Inference for Continuous-Time Gaussian Process Dynamics · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Causal Structure Learning for Dynamical Systems with Theoretical Score Analysis · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Causal Structure Learning for Dynamical Systems with Theoretical Score Analysis · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
exact inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exact Inference for Continuous-Time Gaussian Process Dynamics · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimum description length · 1.0greedy search · 1.0gaussian process inference · 1.0taylor integrator · 0.8numerical integrator · 0.8multistep integrator · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Causal Structure Learning for Dynamical Systems with Theoretical Score AnalysisabstractReal world systems evolve in continuous-time according to their underlying causal relationships, yet their dynamics are often unknown. Existing approaches to learning such dynamics typically either discretize time ---leading to poor performance on irregularly sampled data--- or ignore the underlying causality. We propose CADYT, a novel method for causal discovery on dynamical systems addressing both these challenges. In contrast to state-of-the-art causal discovery methods that model the problem using discrete-time Dynamic Bayesian networks, our formulation is grounded in Difference-based causal models, which allow milder assumptions for modeling the continuous nature of the system. CADYT leverages exact Gaussian Process inference for modeling the continuous-time dynamics which is more aligned with the underlying dynamical process. We propose a practical instantiation that identifies the causal structure via a greedy search guided by the Algorithmic Markov Condition and Minimum Description Length principle. Our experiments show that CADYT outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both regularly and irregularly-sampled data, discovering causal networks closer to the true underlying dynamics. Nicholas Tagliapietra, Katharina Ensinger, Christoph Zimmer, Osman Mian |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Exact Inference for Continuous-Time Gaussian Process DynamicsabstractMany physical systems can be described as a continuous-time dynamical system. In practice, the true system is often unknown and has to be learned from measurement data. Since data is typically collected in discrete time, e.g. by sensors, most methods in Gaussian process (GP) dynamics model learning are trained on one-step ahead predictions. While this scheme is mathematically tempting, it can become problematic in several scenarios, e.g. if measurements are provided at irregularly-sampled time steps or physical system properties have to be conserved. Thus, we aim for a GP model of the true continuous-time dynamics. We tackle this task by leveraging higher-order numerical integrators. These integrators provide the necessary tools to discretize dynamical systems with arbitrary accuracy. However, most higher-order integrators require dynamics evaluations at intermediate time steps, making exact GP inference intractable. In previous work, this problem is often addressed by approximate inference techniques. However, exact GP inference is preferable in many scenarios, e.g. due to its mathematical guarantees. In order to enable direct inference, we propose to leverage multistep and Taylor integrators. We demonstrate how exact inference schemes can be derived for these types of integrators. Further, we derive tailored sampling schemes that allow one to draw consistent dynamics functions from the posterior. The learned model can thus be integrated with arbitrary integrators, just like a standard dynamical system. We show empirically and theoretically that our approach yields an accurate representation of the continuous-time system. Katharina Ensinger, Nicholas Tagliapietra, Sebastian Ziesche, Sebastian Trimpe |
AAAI | 2 |