Vicente Balmaseda

dblp:356/2419 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-7098-9570ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 48% Representation and self-supervised learning · 32% Deep learning architectures and training · 16%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 64% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 28% Mathematical optimization · 8%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
Discriminative Finetuning of Generative Large Language Models without Reward Models and Human Preference Data · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.912025
Discovering Global False Negatives On the Fly for Self-supervised Contrastive Learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
discriminative fine-tuning
0.912025
Discriminative Finetuning of Generative Large Language Models without Reward Models and Human Preference Data · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning
0.912025
Discriminative Finetuning of Generative Large Language Models without Reward Models and Human Preference Data · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
negative sampling
0.912025
Discovering Global False Negatives On the Fly for Self-supervised Contrastive Learning · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.912025
Discriminative Finetuning of Generative Large Language Models without Reward Models and Human Preference Data · ICML 2025
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.812024
Combinatorial Approximations for Cluster Deletion: Simpler, Faster, and Better · ICML 2024
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
combinatorial approximation algorithms
0.812024
Combinatorial Approximations for Cluster Deletion: Simpler, Faster, and Better · ICML 2024
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph clustering
0.812024
Combinatorial Approximations for Cluster Deletion: Simpler, Faster, and Better · ICML 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal representation
image-text representation
0.312025
Discovering Global False Negatives On the Fly for Self-supervised Contrastive Learning · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.212024
Combinatorial Approximations for Cluster Deletion: Simpler, Faster, and Better · ICML 2024
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
LP-based approximation
0.212024
Combinatorial Approximations for Cluster Deletion: Simpler, Faster, and Better · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

threshold learning · 0.9supervised fine-tuning · 0.9optimization-based false negative discovery · 0.9discriminative learning · 0.9greedy algorithm · 0.8derandomization · 0.8combinatorial algorithms · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Discriminative Finetuning of Generative Large Language Models without Reward Models and Human Preference Data
abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) has become a crucial step for aligning pretrained large language models (LLMs) using supervised datasets of input-output pairs. However, despite being supervised, SFT is inherently limited by its generative training objective. To address its limitations, the existing common strategy is to follow SFT with a separate phase of preference optimization (PO), which relies on either human-labeled preference data or a strong reward model to guide the learning process. In this paper, we address the limitations of SFT by exploring one of the most successful techniques in conventional supervised learning: discriminative learning. We introduce Discriminative Fine-Tuning (DFT), an improved variant of SFT, which mitigates the burden of collecting human-labeled preference data or training strong reward models. Unlike SFT that employs a generative approach and overlooks negative data, DFT adopts a discriminative paradigm that increases the probability of positive answers while suppressing potentially negative ones, aiming for data prediction instead of token prediction. Our contributions include: (i) a discriminative probabilistic framework for fine-tuning LLMs by explicitly modeling the discriminative likelihood of an answer among all possible outputs given an input; (ii) efficient algorithms to optimize this discriminative likelihood; and (iii) extensive experiments demonstrating DFT’s effectiveness, achieving performance better than SFT and comparable to if not better than SFT$\rightarrow$PO. The code can be found at https://github.com/Optimization-AI/DFT.
Siqi Guo 0003, Ilgee Hong, Vicente Balmaseda, Changlong Yu, Haoming Jiang, Tuo Zhao, Tianbao Yang
ICML3
2025 Discovering Global False Negatives On the Fly for Self-supervised Contrastive Learning
abstract
In self-supervised contrastive learning, negative pairs are typically constructed using an anchor image and a sample drawn from the entire dataset, excluding the anchor. However, this approach can result in the creation of negative pairs with similar semantics, referred to as "false negatives", leading to their embeddings being falsely pushed apart. To address this issue, we introduce GloFND, an optimization-based approach that automatically learns on the fly the threshold for each anchor data to identify its false negatives during training. In contrast to previous methods for false negative discovery, our approach globally detects false negatives across the entire dataset rather than locally within the mini-batch. Moreover, its per-iteration computation cost remains independent of the dataset size. Experimental results on image and image-text data demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/vibalcam/GloFND.
Vicente Balmaseda, Bokun Wang, Ching-Long Lin, Tianbao Yang
ICML1
2024 Combinatorial Approximations for Cluster Deletion: Simpler, Faster, and Better
abstract
Cluster deletion is an NP-hard graph clustering objective with applications in computational biology and social network analysis, where the goal is to delete a minimum number of edges to partition a graph into cliques. We first provide a tighter analysis of two previous approximation algorithms, improving their approximation guarantees from 4 to 3. Moreover, we show that both algorithms can be derandomized in a surprisingly simple way, by greedily taking a vertex of maximum degree in an auxiliary graph and forming a cluster around it. One of these algorithms relies on solving a linear program. Our final contribution is to design a new and purely combinatorial approach for doing so that is far more scalable in theory and practice.
Vicente Balmaseda, Yixin Cao 0001, Nate Veldt
ICML1