Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Giordano Paoletti

dblp:356/3590 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1764-7666ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.912025
MAD: Multicriteria Anomaly Detection of Suspicious Financial Accounts from Billions of Cash Transactions · KDD (2) 2025
Data mining › anomaly detection
unsupervised anomaly detection
0.912025
MAD: Multicriteria Anomaly Detection of Suspicious Financial Accounts from Billions of Cash Transactions · KDD (2) 2025
Computational finance and economics › financial fraud detection
anti-money laundering
0.312025
MAD: Multicriteria Anomaly Detection of Suspicious Financial Accounts from Billions of Cash Transactions · KDD (2) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule-based system comparison · 1.7machine learning pipeline · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Join the Chat: How Curiosity Sparks Participation in Telegram Groups
abstract
This study delves into the mechanisms that spark user curiosity driving active engagement within public Telegram groups. By analyzing approximately 6 million messages from 29,196 users across 409 groups, we identify and quantify the key factors that stimulate users to actively participate (i.e., send messages) in group discussions. These factors include social influence, novelty, complexity, uncertainty, and conflict, all measured through metrics derived from message sequences and user participation over time. After clustering the messages, we apply explainability techniques to assign meaningful labels to the clusters. This approach uncovers macro categories representing distinct curiosity stimulation profiles, each characterized by a unique combination of various stimuli. Social influence from peers and influencers drives engagement for some users, while for others, rare media types or a diverse range of senders and media sparks curiosity. Analyzing patterns, we found that user curiosity stimuli are mostly stable, but, as the time between the initial message increases, curiosity occasionally shifts. A graph-based analysis of influence networks reveals that users motivated by direct social influence tend to occupy more peripheral positions, while those who are not stimulated by any specific factors are often more central, potentially acting as initiators and conversation catalysts. These findings contribute to understanding information dissemination and spread processes on social media networks, potentially contributing to more effective communication strategies.
Giordano Paoletti, Jussara M. Almeida, Luca Vassio, Marcos André Gonçalves, Marco Mellia
ICWSM1
2025 MAD: Multicriteria Anomaly Detection of Suspicious Financial Accounts from Billions of Cash Transactions
abstract
This paper presents a real-world deployment case study on using unsupervised anomaly detection for Anti-Money Laundering (AML).Using more than 2 billion anonymized bank transactions that Intesa Sanpaolo, a primary Italian financial institution, registered over 8 months, we developed, tuned and deployed a machine learning pipeline in production.Experts from Intesa Sanpaolo validated the performance of our approach against the institution's traditional rule-based system and checked new real-world cases the system allowed them to identify.Besides increasing both precision and recall by a factor of 6 in the detection of high-risk cases, our pipeline raises 200+ additional alerts during the 8-month period, manually identified by branch managers, but missed by the rulebased system.More importantly, a manual inspection of 100 new unseen cases revealed 28 significant previously unreported cases.The pipeline, now fully deployed in Intesa Sanpaolo's Transaction Monitoring system, highlights the advantages of machine learning over traditional approaches typically adopted in this traditionally very conservative sector.
Giordano Paoletti, Flavio Giobergia, Danilo Giordano, Luca Cagliero, Silvia Ronchiadin, Dario Moncalvo, Marco Mellia, Elena Baralis
KDD (2)1
2025 CoDÆN: Benchmarks and Comparison of Evolutionary Community Detection Algorithms for Dynamic Networks
abstract
Web data are often modelled as complex networks in which entities interact and form communities. Nevertheless, web data evolves over time, and network communities change alongside it. This makes Community Detection (CD) in dynamic graphs a relevant problem, calling for evolutionary CD algorithms. The choice and evaluation of such algorithm performance is challenging because of the lack of a comprehensive set of benchmarks and specific metrics. To address these challenges, we propose CoDÆN—Community Detection Algorithms in Evolving Networks—a benchmarking framework for evolutionary CD algorithms in dynamic networks, that we offer as open source to the community. CoDÆN allows us to generate synthetic community-structured graphs with known ground truth and design evolving scenarios combining nine basic graph transformations that modify edges, nodes, and communities. We propose three complementary metrics (i.e., Correctness, Delay, and Stability) to compare evolutionary CD algorithms. Armed with CoDÆN, we consider three evolutionary modularity-based CD approaches, dissecting their performance to gauge the trade-off between the stability of the communities and their correctness. Next, we compare the algorithms in real Web-oriented datasets, confirming such a trade-off. Our findings reveal that algorithms that introduce memory in the graph maximise stability but add delay when abrupt changes occur. Conversely, algorithms that introduce memory by initialising the CD algorithms with the previous solution fail to identify the split and birth of new communities. These observations underscore the value of CoDÆN in facilitating the study and comparison of alternative evolutionary community detection algorithms.
Giordano Paoletti, Luca Gioacchini, Marco Mellia, Luca Vassio, Jussara M. Almeida
ACM Trans. Web1