Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hebatalla Hammad

dblp:356/4573 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
datalog rewriting
0.912025
A Datalog Rewriting Algorithm for Warded Ontologies · IJCAI 2025
Query processing and optimization › semantic query processing
ontology-based query answering
0.912025
A Datalog Rewriting Algorithm for Warded Ontologies · IJCAI 2025
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning
existential rules
0.312025
A Datalog Rewriting Algorithm for Warded Ontologies · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

datalog rewriting · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Datalog Rewriting Algorithm for Warded Ontologies
abstract
Existential rules, a.k.a. tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs), form a well-established formalism for specifying ontologies. In particular, the warded language is a well-behaved fragment of TGD-based ontologies, striking a good balance between expressive power and computational complexity of answering Ontology-Mediated Queries (OMQs). The theoretical foundations of answering OMQs over warded ontologies are by now well-understood, but to the best of our knowledge, very few efforts exist that exploit such a rich theory for building practical query answering algorithms. Our goal is to fill the above gap by designing a novel Datalog rewriting algorithm for OMQs over warded ontologies which is amenable to practical implementations, as well as providing an implementation and an experimental evaluation, with the aim of understanding how key input parameters affect the performance of this approach, and what are its limits when combined with off-the-shelf Datalog-based engines.
Davide Benedetto, Marco Calautti, Hebatalla Hammad, Emanuel Sallinger, Adriano Vlad-Starrabba
IJCAI3