Maxime S. J. Michet

dblp:356/8550 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Legged, aerial and field robots · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots
0.812024
Time-Optimal Gate-Traversing Planner for Autonomous Drone Racing · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › agile flight
drone racing
0.812024
Time-Optimal Gate-Traversing Planner for Autonomous Drone Racing · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory planning
time-optimal planning
0.812024
Time-Optimal Gate-Traversing Planner for Autonomous Drone Racing · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.812024
Time-Optimal Gate-Traversing Planner for Autonomous Drone Racing · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

single-rotor-thrust limit modeling · 0.8gate constraint modeling · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Time-Optimal Gate-Traversing Planner for Autonomous Drone Racing
abstract
In drone racing, the time-minimum trajectory is affected by the drone’s capabilities, the layout of the race track, and the configurations of the gates (e.g., their shapes and sizes). However, previous studies neglect the configuration of the gates, simply rendering drone racing a waypoint-passing task. This formulation often leads to a conservative choice of paths through the gates, as the spatial potential of the gates is not fully utilized. To address this issue, we present a time-optimal planner that can faithfully model gate constraints with various configurations and thereby generate a more time-efficient trajectory while considering the single-rotor-thrust limits. Our approach excels in computational efficiency which only takes a few seconds to compute the full state and control trajectories of the drone through tracks with dozens of different gates. Extensive simulations and experiments confirm the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, showing that the lap time can be further reduced by taking into account the gate’s configuration. We validate our planner in real-world flights and demonstrate super-extreme flight trajectory through race tracks.
Maxime S. J. Michet, Jingxiang Chen, Hugh H. T. Liu
ICRA2