VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peijia Lin
dblp:357/0034
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Equivariant Diffusion for Crystal Structure Prediction · ICML 2024 Crystal Structure Prediction by Joint Equivariant Diffusion · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › geometric diffusion model
equivariant diffusion model |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Equivariant Diffusion for Crystal Structure Prediction · ICML 2024 Crystal Structure Prediction by Joint Equivariant Diffusion · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › materials science
crystal structure prediction |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Crystal Structure Prediction by Joint Equivariant Diffusion · NeurIPS 2023 Equivariant Diffusion for Crystal Structure Prediction · ICML 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
materials science |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Equivariant Diffusion for Crystal Structure Prediction · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
equivariant neural network · 1.5diffusion model · 1.5periodic-e(3)-equivariant denoising · 1.3fractional coordinates · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Equivariant Diffusion for Crystal Structure PredictionabstractIn addressing the challenge of Crystal Structure Prediction (CSP), symmetry-aware deep learning models, particularly diffusion models, have been extensively studied, which treat CSP as a conditional generation task. However, ensuring permutation, rotation, and periodic translation equivariance during diffusion process remains incompletely addressed. In this work, we propose EquiCSP, a novel equivariant diffusion-based generative model. We not only address the overlooked issue of lattice permutation equivariance in existing models, but also develop a unique noising algorithm that rigorously maintains periodic translation equivariance throughout both training and inference processes. Our experiments indicate that EquiCSP significantly surpasses existing models in terms of generating accurate structures and demonstrates faster convergence during the training process. Peijia Lin, Pin Chen, Qing Mo, Jianhuan Cen, Wenbing Huang 0001, Yang Liu 0005, Dan Huang 0001, Yutong Lu |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Crystal Structure Prediction by Joint Equivariant DiffusionabstractCrystal Structure Prediction (CSP) is crucial in various scientific disciplines. While CSP can be addressed by employing currently-prevailing generative models (**e.g.** diffusion models), this task encounters unique challenges owing to the symmetric geometry of crystal structures---the invariance of translation, rotation, and periodicity. To incorporate the above symmetries, this paper proposes DiffCSP, a novel diffusion model to learn the structure distribution from stable crystals. To be specific, DiffCSP jointly generates the lattice and atom coordinates for each crystal by employing a periodic-E(3)-equivariant denoising model, to better model the crystal geometry. Notably, different from related equivariant generative approaches, DiffCSP leverages fractional coordinates other than Cartesian coordinates to represent crystals, remarkably promoting the diffusion and the generation process of atom positions. Extensive experiments verify that our DiffCSP remarkably outperforms existing CSP methods, with a much lower computation cost in contrast to DFT-based methods. Moreover, the superiority of DiffCSP is still observed when it is extended for ab initio crystal generation. Wenbing Huang 0001, Peijia Lin, Jiaqi Han 0001, Pin Chen, Yutong Lu, Yang Liu 0005 |
NeurIPS | 3 |