Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zeju Sun

dblp:357/0387 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-9348-1988ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 67% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian filtering
1.012026
Nonlinear Bayesian Filtering With Natural Gradient Gaussian Approximation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization
fisher information matrix
1.012026
Nonlinear Bayesian Filtering With Natural Gradient Gaussian Approximation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
natural gradient descent
1.012026
Nonlinear Bayesian Filtering With Natural Gradient Gaussian Approximation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stein's lemma · 1.0natural gradient descent · 1.0moment matching · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Nonlinear Bayesian Filtering With Natural Gradient Gaussian Approximation
abstract
Practical Bayes filters often assume the state distribution of each time step to be Gaussian for computational tractability, resulting in the so-called Gaussian filters. When facing nonlinear systems, Gaussian filters such as extended Kalman filter (EKF) or unscented Kalman filter (UKF) typically rely on certain linearization techniques, which can introduce large estimation errors. To address this issue, this paper reconstructs the prediction and update steps of Gaussian filtering as solutions to two distinct optimization problems, whose optimal conditions are found to have analytical forms from Stein's lemma. It is observed that the stationary point for the prediction step requires calculating the first two moments of the prior distribution, which is equivalent to that step in existing moment-matching filters. In the update step, instead of linearizing the model to approximate the stationary points, we propose an iterative approach to directly minimize the update step's objective to avoid linearization errors. For the purpose of performing the steepest descent on the Gaussian manifold, we derive its natural gradient that leverages Fisher information matrix to adjust the gradient direction, accounting for the curvature of the parameter space. Combining this update step with moment matching in the prediction step, we introduce a new iterative filter for nonlinear systems called Natural Gradient Gaussian Approximation filter, or NANO filter for short. We prove that NANO filter locally converges to the optimal Gaussian approximation at each time step. Furthermore, the estimation error is proven exponentially bounded for nearly linear measurement equation and low noise levels through constructing a supermartingale-like property across consecutive time steps. Real-world experiments demonstrate that, compared to popular Gaussian filters such as EKF, UKF, iterated EKF, and posterior linearization filter, NANO filter reduces the average root mean square error by approximately 45% while maintaining a comparable computational burden.
Wenhan Cao, Zeju Sun, Chang Liu 0002, Stephen S.-T. Yau, Shengbo Eben Li
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3