Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vedang Bhupesh Shenvi Nadkarni

dblp:357/1391 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-3749-6024ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 62% Robot navigation and mapping · 19% Segmentation and scene understanding · 19%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing
0.812024
GLiDR: Topologically Regularized Graph Generative Network for Sparse LiDAR Point Clouds · CVPR 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.212024
GLiDR: Topologically Regularized Graph Generative Network for Sparse LiDAR Point Clouds · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › video segmentation
static-dynamic segmentation
0.212024
GLiDR: Topologically Regularized Graph Generative Network for Sparse LiDAR Point Clouds · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topological regularization · 0.8persistent homology · 0.8graph generative network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 GLiDR: Topologically Regularized Graph Generative Network for Sparse LiDAR Point Clouds
abstract
Sparse LiDAR point clouds cause severe loss of detail of static structures and reduce the density of static points available for navigation. Reduced density can be detrimental to navigation under several scenarios. We observe that despite high sparsity, in most cases, the global topology of LiDAR outlining the static structures can be inferred. We utilize this property to obtain a backbone skeleton of a LiDAR scan in the form of a single connected component that is a proxy to its global topology. We utilize the backbone to augment new points along static structures to overcome sparsity. Newly introduced points could correspond to existing static structures or to static points that were earlier obstructed by dynamic objects. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to use such a strategy for sparse LiDAR point clouds. Existing solutions close to our approach fail to identify and preserve the global static Li-DAR topology and generate sub-optimal points. We propose GLiDR, a Graph Generative network that is topologically regularized using 0-dimensional Persistent Homology (PH) constraints. This enables GLiDR to introduce newer static points along a topologically consistent global static LiDAR backbone. GLiDR generates precise static points using 32 × sparser dynamic scans and performs better than the baselines across three datasets. GLiDR generates a valuable byproduct - an accurate binary segmentation mask of static and dynamic objects that are helpful for navigation planning and safety in constrained environments. The newly introduced static points allow GLiDR to outperform LiDAR-based navigation using SLAM in several settings. Source code is available at https://github.com/GLiDR-CVPR2024/GLiDR.
Kshitij Madhav Bhat, Vedang Bhupesh Shenvi Nadkarni, Prem Kumar Kalra
CVPR3
2023 Differentiable SLAM Helps Deep Learning-based LiDAR Perception Tasks
Dheeraj Vattikonda, Vedang Bhupesh Shenvi Nadkarni, Erqun Dong, Sabyasachi Sahoo
BMVC3