Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yanchi Dong
dblp:357/2916
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-5321-8297ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 34% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 30% Energy-efficient computing · 30% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 57% Reinforcement learning · 43% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy-efficient computing › voltage scaling
dynamic voltage scaling |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CREATE: Cross-Layer Resilience Characterization and Optimization for Efficient yet Reliable Embodied AI Systems · ASPLOS (2) 2026 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
error injection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CREATE: Cross-Layer Resilience Characterization and Optimization for Efficient yet Reliable Embodied AI Systems · ASPLOS (2) 2026 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CREATE: Cross-Layer Resilience Characterization and Optimization for Efficient yet Reliable Embodied AI Systems · ASPLOS (2) 2026 |
Energy-efficient computing
voltage scaling |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CREATE: Cross-Layer Resilience Characterization and Optimization for Efficient yet Reliable Embodied AI Systems · ASPLOS (2) 2026 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SPARK: An Efficient Hybrid Acceleration Architecture with Run-Time Sparsity-Aware Scheduling for TinyML Learning · DAC 2024 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › training accelerator
on-device training accelerator |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SPARK: An Efficient Hybrid Acceleration Architecture with Run-Time Sparsity-Aware Scheduling for TinyML Learning · DAC 2024 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › edge accelerator
TinyML accelerator |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SPARK: An Efficient Hybrid Acceleration Architecture with Run-Time Sparsity-Aware Scheduling for TinyML Learning · DAC 2024 |
Distributed systems
edge computing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SPARK: An Efficient Hybrid Acceleration Architecture with Run-Time Sparsity-Aware Scheduling for TinyML Learning · DAC 2024 |
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded machine learning
TinyML |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SPARK: An Efficient Hybrid Acceleration Architecture with Run-Time Sparsity-Aware Scheduling for TinyML Learning · DAC 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › edge computing
edge inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Model-Specific End-to-End Design Methodology for Resource-Constrained TinyML Hardware · DAC 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
resource-constrained learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Model-Specific End-to-End Design Methodology for Resource-Constrained TinyML Hardware · DAC 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight rotation · 2.0autonomy-adaptive voltage scaling · 2.0anomaly detection · 2.0roofline model · 1.3low-voltage operation · 1.3design space exploration · 1.3unified memory system · 0.8run-time sparsity-aware scheduling · 0.8in-pipeline acceleration · 0.8hybrid acceleration architecture · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CREATE: Cross-Layer Resilience Characterization and Optimization for Efficient yet Reliable Embodied AI SystemsabstractEmbodied Artificial Intelligence (AI) has recently attracted significant attention as it bridges AI with the physical world. Modern embodied AI systems often combine a Large Language Model (LLM)-based planner for high-level task planning and a reinforcement learning (RL)-based controller for low-level action generation, enabling embodied agents to tackle complex tasks in real-world environments. However, deploying embodied agents remains challenging due to their high computation requirements, especially for battery-powered local devices. Although techniques like lowering operating voltage can improve energy efficiency, they can introduce bit errors and result in task failures. In this work, we propose CREATE, a general design principle that leverages heterogeneous resilience at different layers for synergistic energy-reliability co-optimization. For the first time, we conduct a comprehensive error injection study on modern embodied AI systems and observe an inherent but heterogeneous fault tolerance. Building upon these insights, we develop an anomaly detection and clearance mechanism at the circuit level to eliminate outlier errors. At the model level, we propose a weight-rotation-enhanced planning algorithm to improve the fault tolerance of the LLM-based planner. Furthermore, we introduce an application-level technique, autonomy-adaptive voltage scaling, to dynamically adjust the operating voltage of the controllers. The voltage scaling circuit is co-designed to enable online voltage adjustment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that without compromising task quality, CREATE achieves 40.6% computational energy savings on average over nominal-voltage baselines and 35.0% over prior-art techniques. This further leads to 29.5% to 37.3% chip-level energy savings and approximately a 15% to 30% improvement in battery life. Tong Xie, Yijiahao Qi, Jinqi Wen, Zishen Wan, Yanchi Dong, Shaofei Cai, Yitao Liang, Yuan Wang 0001, Runsheng Wang, Meng Li 0004 |
ASPLOS (2) | 5 |
| 2024 | SPARK: An Efficient Hybrid Acceleration Architecture with Run-Time Sparsity-Aware Scheduling for TinyML LearningabstractCurrently most TinyML devices only focus on inference, as training requires much more hardware resources. In this paper, we introduce SPARK, an efficient hybrid acceleration architecture with run-time sparsity-aware scheduling for TinyML learning. Besides a standalone accelerator, an in-pipeline acceleration unit is integrated within the CPU pipeline to support simultaneous forward and backward propagation. To better utilize sparsity and improve hardware utilization, a sparsity-aware acceleration scheduler is implemented to schedule the workload between two acceleration units. A unified memory system is also constructed to support transposable data fetch, reducing memory access. We implement SPARK using TSMC 22nm technology and evaluate different TinyML tasks. Compared with the baseline accelerator, SPARK achieves 4.1× performance improvement in average with only 2.27% area overhead. SPARK also outperforms off-shelf edge devices in performance by 9.4× with 446.0× higher efficiency. Qinzhe Zhi, Yanchi Dong, Le Ye |
DAC | 3 |
| 2024 | Hierarchical Power Co-Optimization and Management for LLM Chiplet DesignsabstractThe demand for efficient and high-performance hardware for large language models (LLMs) has driven the development of scalable chiplet design, which requires careful power optimization and management. This paper presents a co-optimization and management methodology for hierarchical power delivery of chiplet designs targeting LLM applications. To model LLM workload mapping and power delivery, we first build a scalable chiplet simulator, which demonstrates different power strategies have notable efficiency impact and require careful and thorough optimizations. We further develop a co-optimization framework ScalePoM for chiplet power management. Based on given LLM model and PPA requirements, ScalePoM can automatically explore the chiplet architecture and workload mapping for optimal hierarchical power delivery. Our co-optimization methodology is evaluated through two scaled LLM chiplets with different interconnect topologies, achieving an average of 45% and up to 62% energy saving for large language model inferences with various sparsity levels. Yanchi Dong, Xiaochen Hao, Yun Liang 0001, Ru Huang 0001, Le Ye |
ICCAD | 1 |
| 2023 | A Model-Specific End-to-End Design Methodology for Resource-Constrained TinyML HardwareabstractTiny machine learning (TinyML) becomes appealing as it enables machine learning on resource-constrained devices with ultra low energy and small form factor. In this paper, a model-specific end-to-end design methodology is presented for TinyML hardware design. First, we introduce an end-to-end system evaluation method using Roofline models, which considering both AI and other general-purpose computing to guide the architecture design choices. Second, to improve the efficiency of AI computation, we develop an enhanced design space exploration framework, TinyScale, to enable optimal low-voltage operation for energy-efficient TinyML. Finally, we present a use case driven design selection method to search the optimal hardware design across a set of application use cases. Our model-specific design methodology is evaluated on both TSMC 22nm and 55nm technology for MLPerf Tiny benchmark and a keyword spotting (KWS) SoC design. With the help of our end-to-end design methodology, an optimal TinyML hardware can be automatically explored with significant energy and EDP improvements for a diverse of TinyML use cases. Yanchi Dong, Kaixuan Du, Yiqi Jing, Qijun Wang, Pixian Zhan, Fengyun Yan, Yufei Ma 0002, Yun Liang 0001, Le Ye, Ru Huang 0001 |
DAC | 1 |