VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jack Guo
dblp:357/4954
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Turbulence in Focus: Benchmarking Scaling Behavior of 3D Volumetric Super-Resolution with BLASTNet 2.0 Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics
turbulence simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Turbulence in Focus: Benchmarking Scaling Behavior of 3D Volumetric Super-Resolution with BLASTNet 2.0 Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Image and video processing
super-resolution |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Turbulence in Focus: Benchmarking Scaling Behavior of 3D Volumetric Super-Resolution with BLASTNet 2.0 Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
physics-based loss · 1.3neural scaling analysis · 1.3deep learning · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Turbulence in Focus: Benchmarking Scaling Behavior of 3D Volumetric Super-Resolution with BLASTNet 2.0 DataabstractAnalysis of compressible turbulent flows is essential for applications related to propulsion, energy generation, and the environment. Here, we present BLASTNet 2.0, a 2.2 TB network-of-datasets containing 744 full-domain samples from 34 high-fidelity direct numerical simulations, which addresses the current limited availability of 3D high-fidelity reacting and non-reacting compressible turbulent flow simulation data. With this data, we benchmark a total of 49 variations of five deep learning approaches for 3D super-resolution - which can be applied for improving scientific imaging, simulations, turbulence models, as well as in computer vision applications. We perform neural scaling analysis on these models to examine the performance of different machine learning (ML) approaches, including two scientific ML techniques. We demonstrate that (i) predictive performance can scale with model size and cost, (ii) architecture matters significantly, especially for smaller models, and (iii) the benefits of physics-based losses can persist with increasing model size. The outcomes of this benchmark study are anticipated to offer insights that can aid the design of 3D super-resolution models, especially for turbulence models, while this data is expected to foster ML methods for a broad range of flow physics applications. This data is publicly available with download links and browsing tools consolidated at https://blastnet.github.io. Wai Tong Chung, Bassem Akoush, Pushan Sharma, Alex Tamkin, Ki Sung Jung, Jacqueline Chen, Jack Guo, Davy Brouzet, Mohsen Talei, Bruno Savard, Alexei Y. Poludnenko, Matthias Ihme |
NeurIPS | 7 |