Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ana Ezquerro
dblp:358/3553
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-2347-9706ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
graph-based parsing |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Hierarchical Bracketing Encodings Work for Dependency Graphs · EMNLP 2025 Dependency Graph Parsing as Sequence Labeling · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
semantic dependency parsing |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Hierarchical Bracketing Encodings Work for Dependency Graphs · EMNLP 2025 Dependency Graph Parsing as Sequence Labeling · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hierarchical Bracketing Encodings for Dependency Parsing as Tagging · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hierarchical Bracketing Encodings for Dependency Parsing as Tagging · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.5 | 2 | 2025 | Hierarchical Bracketing Encodings Work for Dependency Graphs · EMNLP 2025 Dependency Graph Parsing as Sequence Labeling · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical bracketing · 1.7sequence tagging · 0.9hierarchical bracketing encoding · 0.9sequence labeling · 0.8linearization encodings · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hierarchical Bracketing Encodings for Dependency Parsing as TaggingabstractWe present a family of encodings for sequence labeling dependency parsing, based on the concept of hierarchical bracketing. We prove that the existing 4-bit projective encoding belongs to this family, but it is suboptimal in the number of labels used to encode a tree. We derive an optimal hierarchical bracketing, which minimizes the number of symbols used and encodes projective trees using only 12 distinct labels (vs. 16 for the 4-bit encoding). We also extend optimal hierarchical bracketing to support arbitrary non-projectivity in a more compact way than previous encodings. Our new encodings yield competitive accuracy on a diverse set of treebanks. Ana Ezquerro, David Vilares 0001, Anssi Yli-Jyrä, Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Hierarchical Bracketing Encodings Work for Dependency GraphsabstractWe revisit hierarchical bracketing encodings from a practical perspective in the context of dependency graph parsing.The approach encodes graphs as sequences, enabling lineartime parsing with n tagging actions, and still representing reentrancies, cycles, and empty nodes.Compared to existing graph linearizations, this representation substantially reduces the label space while preserving structural information.We evaluate it on a multilingual and multi-formalism benchmark, showing competitive results and consistent improvements over other methods in exact match accuracy. Ana Ezquerro, Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez, David Vilares 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2024 | Dependency Graph Parsing as Sequence LabelingabstractVarious linearizations have been proposed to cast syntactic dependency parsing as sequence labeling.However, these approaches do not support more complex graph-based representations, such as semantic dependencies or enhanced universal dependencies, as they cannot handle reentrancy or cycles.By extending them, we define a range of unbounded and bounded linearizations that can be used to cast graph parsing as a tagging task, enlarging the toolbox of problems that can be solved under this paradigm.Experimental results on semantic dependency and enhanced UD parsing show that with a good choice of encoding, sequencelabeling dependency graph parsers combine high efficiency with accuracies close to the state of the art, in spite of their simplicity. Ana Ezquerro, David Vilares 0001, Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez |
EMNLP | 1 |