Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yair Cohen
dblp:358/3981
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Flow Matching for Resolving Small-Scale Physics · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image reconstruction
super-resolution |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Flow Matching for Resolving Small-Scale Physics · ICML 2025 |
Environmental and earth informatics
weather forecasting |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Flow Matching for Resolving Small-Scale Physics · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
flow matching · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7adaptive noise scaling · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Adaptive Flow Matching for Resolving Small-Scale PhysicsabstractConditional diffusion and flow models are effective for super-resolving small-scale details in natural images. However, in physical sciences such as weather, three major challenges arise: (i) spatially misaligned input-output distributions (PDEs at different resolutions lead to divergent trajectories), (ii) misaligned and distinct input-output channels (channel synthesis), (iii) several channels with diverse stochasticity scales (multiscale). To address these, we propose to first encode inputs into a latent base distribution that is closer to the target, then apply Flow Matching to generate small-scale physics. The encoder captures deterministic components, while Flow Matching adds stochastic details. To handle uncertainty in the deterministic part, we inject noise via an adaptive noise scaling mechanism, dynamically adjusted by maximum-likelihood estimates of the encoder’s predictions. Experiments on real-world weather data (including super-resolution from 25 km to 2 km scales in Taiwan) and in synthetic Kolmogorov flow datasets show that our proposed Adaptive Flow Matching (AFM) framework outperforms existing methods and produces better-calibrated ensembles. Stathi Fotiadis, Noah D. Brenowitz, Tomas Geffner, Yair Cohen, Michael S. Pritchard, Arash Vahdat, Morteza Mardani |
ICML | 4 |