Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pingzhi Li
dblp:358/4405
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 8 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 49% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Language models and text generation · 18% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 57% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 24% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 19% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Occult: Optimizing Collaborative Communications across Experts for Accelerated Parallel MoE Training and Inference · ICML 2025 Glider: Global and Local Instruction-Driven Expert Router · EMNLP 2025 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › interprocessor communication
all-to-all communication |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Occult: Optimizing Collaborative Communications across Experts for Accelerated Parallel MoE Training and Inference · ICML 2025 Mozart: Modularized and Efficient MoE Training on 3.5D Wafer-Scale Chiplet Architectures · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation › personalization
continual personalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PortLLM: Personalizing Evolving Large Language Models with Training-Free and Portable Model Patches · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Occult: Optimizing Collaborative Communications across Experts for Accelerated Parallel MoE Training and Inference · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › parallelization
expert parallelism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Occult: Optimizing Collaborative Communications across Experts for Accelerated Parallel MoE Training and Inference · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › mixture of experts
expert routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Glider: Global and Local Instruction-Driven Expert Router · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Glider: Global and Local Instruction-Driven Expert Router · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PortLLM: Personalizing Evolving Large Language Models with Training-Free and Portable Model Patches · ICLR 2025 |
Distributed systems
communication optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Occult: Optimizing Collaborative Communications across Experts for Accelerated Parallel MoE Training and Inference · ICML 2025 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mozart: Modularized and Efficient MoE Training on 3.5D Wafer-Scale Chiplet Architectures · NeurIPS 2025 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning › distributed training
mixture-of-experts training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mozart: Modularized and Efficient MoE Training on 3.5D Wafer-Scale Chiplet Architectures · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
backpropagation-free training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning: A Benchmark · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model merging
expert merging |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing Policy · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning: A Benchmark · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
low-rank approximation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing Policy · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › memory-efficient training
memory-efficient fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning: A Benchmark · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing Policy · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
model scaling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Model-GLUE: Democratized LLM Scaling for A Large Model Zoo in the Wild · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning: A Benchmark · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning: A Benchmark · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model reuse |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Model-GLUE: Democratized LLM Scaling for A Large Model Zoo in the Wild · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fine-tuning · 1.7collaboration pruning · 1.7model patches · 0.9instruction-driven routing · 0.9fine-grained scheduling · 0.9expert routing · 0.9expert allocation · 0.9algorithm-hardware co-design · 0.9LoRA · 0.9routing statistics · 0.8neuron permutation alignment · 0.8low-rank decomposition · 0.8block-wise descent · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Glider: Global and Local Instruction-Driven Expert RouterabstractThe development of performant pre-trained models has driven the advancement of routingbased expert models tailored to specific tasks.However, these methods often favor generalization over performance on held-in tasks.This limitation adversely impacts practical applicability, as real-world deployments require robust performance across both known and novel tasks.We observe that current token-level routing mechanisms neglect the global semantic context of the input task.To address this, we propose a novel method, Global and Local Instruction Driven Expert Router (GLIDER) that proposes a multi-scale routing mechanism, encompassing a semantic global router and a learned local router.The global router leverages recent LLMs' semantic reasoning capabilities to generate task-specific instructions from the input query, guiding expert selection across all layers.This global guidance is complemented by a local router that facilitates token-level routing decisions within each module, enabling finer control and enhanced performance on unseen and challenging tasks.Our experiments using T5-based expert models for T0 and FLAN tasks demonstrate that GLIDER achieves substantially improved held-in performance while maintaining strong generalization on held-out tasks.Additionally, we perform ablations experiments to dive deeper into the components of GLIDER and plot routing distributions to show that GLIDER can effectively retrieve the correct expert for held-in tasks while also demonstrating compositional capabilities for held-out tasks.Our experiments highlight the importance of our multi-scale routing that leverages LLM-driven semantic reasoning for MoErging methods.checking explanations.In Pingzhi Li, Prateek Yadav, Jaehong Yoon, Jie Peng 0002, Yi-Lin Sung, Mohit Bansal, Tianlong Chen 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | PortLLM: Personalizing Evolving Large Language Models with Training-Free and Portable Model PatchesabstractAs large language models (LLMs) increasingly shape the AI landscape, fine-tuning pretrained models has become more popular than in the pre-LLM era for achieving optimal performance in domain-specific tasks. However, pretrained LLMs such as ChatGPT are periodically evolved (i.e., model parameters are frequently updated), making it challenging for downstream users with limited resources to keep up with fine-tuning the newest LLMs for their domain application. Even though fine-tuning costs have nowadays been reduced thanks to the innovations of parameter-efficient fine-tuning such as LoRA, not all downstream users have adequate computing for frequent personalization. Moreover, access to fine-tuning datasets, particularly in sensitive domains such as healthcare, could be time-restrictive, making it crucial to retain the knowledge encoded in earlier fine-tuned rounds for future adaptation. In this paper, we present PORTLLM, a training-free framework that (i) creates an initial lightweight model update patch to capture domain-specific knowledge, and (ii) allows a subsequent seamless plugging for the continual personalization of evolved LLM at minimal cost. Our extensive experiments cover seven representative datasets, from easier question-answering tasks {BoolQ, SST2} to harder reasoning tasks {WinoGrande, GSM8K}, and models including {Mistral-7B,Llama2, Llama3.1, and Gemma2}, validating the portability of our designed model patches and showcasing the effectiveness of our proposed framework. For instance, PORTLLM achieves comparable performance to LoRA fine-tuning with reductions of up to 12.2× in GPU memory usage. Finally, we provide theoretical justifications to understand the portability of our model update patches, which offers new insights into the theoretical dimension of LLMs’ personalization. Rana Muhammad Shahroz, Pingzhi Li, Sukwon Yun, Shahriar Nirjon, Chau-Wai Wong, Tianlong Chen 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Occult: Optimizing Collaborative Communications across Experts for Accelerated Parallel MoE Training and InferenceabstractMixture-of-experts (MoE) architectures could achieve impressive computational efficiency with expert parallelism, which relies heavily on all-to-all communication across devices. Unfortunately, such communication overhead typically constitutes a significant portion of the total runtime, hampering the scalability of distributed training and inference for modern MoE models (consuming over 40% runtime in large-scale training). In this paper, we first define $\textit{collaborative communication}$ to illustrate this intrinsic limitation, and then propose system- and algorithm-level innovations to reduce communication costs. Specifically, given a pair of experts co-activated by one token, we call them as $\textit{collaborated}$, which comprises $2$ cases as $\textit{intra-}$ and $\textit{inter-collaboration}$, depending on whether they are kept on the same device. Our pilot investigations reveal that augmenting the proportion of intra-collaboration can accelerate expert parallel at scale. It motivates us to strategically $\underline{\texttt{o}}$ptimize $\underline{\texttt{c}}$ollaborative $\underline{\texttt{c}}$omm$\underline{\texttt{u}}$nication for acce$\underline{\texttt{l}}$era$\underline{\texttt{t}}$ed MoE training and inference, dubbed $\textbf{\texttt{Occult}}$. Our designs are capable of $\underline{either}$ delivering exact results with reduced communication cost, $\underline{or}$ controllably minimizing the cost with collaboration pruning, materialized by modified fine-tuning. Comprehensive experiments on various MoE-LLMs demonstrate that $\texttt{Occult}$ can be faster than popular state-of-the-art inference or training frameworks (over 50% speed up across multiple tasks and models) with comparable or superior quality compared to the standard fine-tuning. Codes will be available upon acceptance. Shuqing Luo, Pingzhi Li, Jie Peng 0002, Yang Zhao 0013, Yu Cao 0001, Yu Cheng 0001, Tianlong Chen 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Advancing MoE Efficiency: A Collaboration-Constrained Routing (C2R) Strategy for Better Expert Parallelism DesignabstractMohan Zhang, Pingzhi Li, Jie Peng, Mufan Qiu, Tianlong Chen. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Mohan Zhang, Pingzhi Li, Jie Peng 0002, Mufan Qiu, Tianlong Chen 0001 |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 2 |
| 2025 | Mozart: Modularized and Efficient MoE Training on 3.5D Wafer-Scale Chiplet ArchitecturesabstractMixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture offers enhanced efficiency for Large Language Models (LLMs) with modularized computation, yet its inherent sparsity poses significant hardware deployment challenges, including memory locality issues, communication overhead, and inefficient computing resource utilization. Inspired by the modular organization of the human brain, we propose $\texttt{Mozart}$, a novel algorithm-hardware co-design framework tailored for efficient training of MoE-based LLMs on 3.5D wafer-scale chiplet architectures. On the algorithm side, $\texttt{Mozart}$ exploits the inherent modularity of chiplets and introduces:
($1$) an expert allocation strategy that enables efficient on-package all-to-all communication, and ($2$) a fine-grained scheduling mechanism that improves communication-computation overlap through streaming tokens and experts. On the architecture side, $\texttt{Mozart}$ adaptively co-locates heterogeneous modules on specialized chiplets with a 2.5D NoP-Tree topology and hierarchical memory structure.
Evaluation across three popular MoE models demonstrates significant efficiency gains, enabling more effective parallelization and resource utilization for large-scale modularized MoE-LLMs. Shuqing Luo, Pingzhi Li, Jiayin Qin, Jie Peng 0002, Yang Zhao 0013, Yu Cao 0001, Tianlong Chen 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2025 | Protecting Privacy against Membership Inference Attack with LLM Fine-tuning through FlatnessabstractThe privacy concerns associated with the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) have grown dramatically with the development of pioneer LLMs such as ChatGPT. Differential Privacy (DP) techniques that utilize DP-SGD are explored in existing work to mitigate their privacy risks at the cost of generalization degradation. Our paper reveals that the flatness of DP-SGD trained models’ loss landscape plays an essential role in the trade-off between their privacy and generalization. We further propose a holistic framework Privacy-Flat to enforce appropriate weight flatness, which substantially improves model generalization with promising privacy protection. It innovates from three coarse-to-grained levels: Perturbation-aware min-max optimization within a layer, flatness-guided sparse prefix-tuning across layers, and weight knowledge distillation between private & non-private weights copies. We empirically demonstrate that our framework Privacy-Flat outperforms vanilla private training baseline while protecting privacy from membership inference attacks (MIA). Comprehensive experiments of both black-box and white-box scenarios are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposal in enhancing generalization. The code link is provided at https://github.com/tiejin98/Privacy_ Flatness. Tiejin Chen, Longchao Da, Huixue Zhou, Pingzhi Li, Kaixiong Zhou, Tianlong Chen 0001, Hua Wei 0001 |
SDM | 4 |
| 2024 | Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing PolicyabstractSparsely activated Mixture-of-Experts (SMoE) has shown promise to scale up the learning capacity of neural networks, however, they have issues like: ($a$) $\textit{High Memory Usage,}$ due to duplication of the network layers into multiple copies as experts; and ($b$) $\textit{Redundancy in Experts,}$ as common learning-based routing policies suffer from representational collapse. Therefore, vanilla SMoE models are memory inefficient and non-scalable, especially for resource-constrained downstream scenarios. In this paper, we ask: Can we craft a compact SMoE model by consolidating expert information? What is the best recipe to merge multiple experts into fewer but more knowledgeable experts? Our pilot investigation reveals that conventional model merging methods fail to be effective in such expert merging for SMoE. The potential reasons are: ($1$) redundant information overshadows critical experts; ($2$) appropriate neuron permutation for each expert is missing to bring all of them in alignment. To address these challenges, we propose a novel merging algorithm for SMoE, $\textit{i.e.}$, $\texttt{M-SMoE}$, which leverages routing statistics to guide expert merging. Specifically, it starts with neuron permutation alignment for experts; then, dominant experts and their "group members" are formed based on routing policies; lastly, every expert group is merged into a single expert by utilizing each expert's activation frequency as their weight for merging, thus diminishing the impact of insignificant experts. Moreover, we draw an interesting observation that our proposed merging promotes a low dimensionality in the merged expert's weight space, naturally paving the way for additional compression. Hence, our final method, $\texttt{MC-SMoE}$ ($\textit{i.e.}$, Merge, then Compress SMoE), further decomposes the merged experts into low-rank and structural sparse alternatives. Extensive experiments across $8$ benchmarks validate the effectiveness of our proposals. For instance, our $\texttt{MC-SMoE}$ achieves up to $80\%$ memory and a $20\%$ FLOPs reduction, with virtually no loss in performance. Our code is provided as supplementary material. Pingzhi Li, Zhenyu Zhang 0015, Prateek Yadav, Yi-Lin Sung, Yu Cheng 0001, Mohit Bansal, Tianlong Chen 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning: A BenchmarkabstractIn the evolving landscape of natural language processing (NLP), fine-tuning pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) with first-order (FO) optimizers like SGD and Adam has become standard. Yet, as LLMs grow in size, the substantial memory overhead from back-propagation (BP) for FO gradient computation presents a significant challenge. Addressing this issue is crucial, especially for applications like on-device training where memory efficiency is paramount. This paper proposes a shift towards BP-free, zeroth-order (ZO) optimization as a solution for reducing memory costs during LLM fine-tuning, building on the initial concept introduced by (Malladi et al., 2023). Unlike traditional ZO-SGD methods, ou让work expands the exploration to a wider array of ZO optimization techniques, through a comprehensive, first-of-its-kind benchmarking study across five LLM families, three task complexities, and five fine-tuning schemes. Our study unveils previously overlooked optimization principles, highlighting the importance of task alignment, the role of the forward gradient method, and the balance between algorithm complexity and fine-tuning performance. We further introduce novel enhancements to ZO optimization, including block-wise descent, hybrid training, and gradient sparsity. Our study offers a promising direction for achieving further memory-efficient LLM fine-tuning. Codes to reproduce all our experiments will be made public. Pingzhi Li, Junyuan Hong, Wenqing Zheng, Jason D. Lee, Wotao Yin, Mingyi Hong 0001, Zhangyang Wang, Sijia Liu 0001, Tianlong Chen 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Model-GLUE: Democratized LLM Scaling for A Large Model Zoo in the Wild
Guoheng Sun, Ruisi Cai, Pingzhi Li, Peihao Wang, Bowen Tan, Yexiao He, Beidi Chen, Binhang Yuan, Hongyi Wang 0001, Ang Li 0005, Zhangyang Wang, Tianlong Chen 0001 |
NeurIPS | 5 |