Muling Wu

dblp:358/8927 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 54% Efficient and distributed learning · 46%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 56% Program synthesis and code generation · 44%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
1.012026
What is wrong with your code generated by large language models? An extensive study · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2026
Program analysis
code quality analysis
1.012026
What is wrong with your code generated by large language models? An extensive study · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.812024
Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation Engineering · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.812024
Advancing Parameter Efficiency in Fine-tuning via Representation Editing · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.812024
Advancing Parameter Efficiency in Fine-tuning via Representation Editing · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
preference alignment
0.812024
Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation Engineering · ACL (1) 2024
Program analysis › static analysis
bug detection
0.312026
What is wrong with your code generated by large language models? An extensive study · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.212024
Advancing Parameter Efficiency in Fine-tuning via Representation Editing · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.0representation engineering · 0.8representation editing · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 What is wrong with your code generated by large language models? An extensive study
Shihan Dou, Haoxiang Jia, Shenxi Wu, Huiyuan Zheng, Muling Wu, Yunbo Tao, Ming Zhang 0030, Mingxu Chai, Jessica Fan, Zhiheng Xi, Yueming Wu 0001, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang 0001, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang 0001
Sci. China Inf. Sci.5
2026 SpikeBERT: A language spikformer learned from BERT with knowledge distillation
Changze Lv, Tianlong Li, Weiming Qiao, Muling Wu, Shihan Dou, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang 0001
Neural Networks5
2025 SpikeBERT: A Language Understanding Spiking Neural Network Learned from BERT with Knowledge Distillation
Changze Lv, Tianlong Li, Muling Wu, Shihan Dou, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang 0001
CogSci4
2025 Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspective
abstract
The recent surge in jailbreaking attacks has revealed significant vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) when exposed to malicious inputs. While various defense strategies have been proposed to mitigate these threats, there has been limited research into the underlying mechanisms that make LLMs vulnerable to such attacks. In this study, we suggest that the self-safeguarding capability of LLMs is linked to specific activity patterns within their representation space. Although these patterns have little impact on the semantic content of the generated text, they play a crucial role in shaping LLM behavior under jailbreaking attacks. Our findings demonstrate that these patterns can be detected with just a few pairs of contrastive queries. Extensive experimentation shows that the robustness of LLMs against jailbreaking can be manipulated by weakening or strengthening these patterns. Further visual analysis provides additional evidence for our conclusions, providing new insights into the jailbreaking phenomenon. These findings highlight the importance of addressing the potential misuse of open-source LLMs within the community.
Tianlong Li, Zhenghua Wang, Muling Wu, Shihan Dou, Changze Lv, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang 0001
COLING4
2025 Improving RL Exploration for LLM Reasoning Through Retrospective Replay
Shihan Dou, Muling Wu, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang 0001
NLPCC (1)2
2025 SpikeCLIP: A contrastive language-image pretrained spiking neural network
Changze Lv, Tianlong Li, Yufei Gu, Jianhan Xu, Cenyuan Zhang, Muling Wu, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang 0001
Neural Networks7
2024 Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation Engineering
abstract
Wenhao Liu, Xiaohua Wang, Muling Wu, Tianlong Li, Changze Lv, Zixuan Ling, Zhu JianHao, Cenyuan Zhang, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Muling Wu, Tianlong Li, Changze Lv, Zixuan Ling, Jianhao Zhu, Cenyuan Zhang, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang 0001
ACL (1)3
2024 Advancing Parameter Efficiency in Fine-tuning via Representation Editing
abstract
Muling Wu, Wenhao Liu, Xiaohua Wang, Tianlong Li, Changze Lv, Zixuan Ling, Zhu JianHao, Cenyuan Zhang, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Muling Wu, Tianlong Li, Changze Lv, Zixuan Ling, Jianhao Zhu, Cenyuan Zhang, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang 0001
ACL (1)1