Athina Terzoglou

dblp:358/9405 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
mechanism design
1.722026
Hallucinating Flows for Optimal Mechanisms · SODA 2026
On the Robustness of Mechanism Design under Total Variation Distance · NeurIPS 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory
multi-item auctions
1.012026
Hallucinating Flows for Optimal Mechanisms · SODA 2026
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design
revenue-maximizing auction
1.012026
Hallucinating Flows for Optimal Mechanisms · SODA 2026
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
revenue maximization
0.712023
On the Robustness of Mechanism Design under Total Variation Distance · NeurIPS 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
robust mechanism design
0.712023
On the Robustness of Mechanism Design under Total Variation Distance · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

total variation distance · 0.7duality · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Pseudo-Equilibria, Or: How to Stop Worrying About Crypto and Just Analyze the Game
Christos-Alexandros Psomas, Athina Terzoglou, Yu Wei 0007, Vassilis Zikas
CRYPTO (1)2
2026 Hallucinating Flows for Optimal Mechanisms
abstract
Myerson’s seminal characterization of the revenue-optimal auction for a single item remains a cornerstone of mechanism design. However, generalizing this framework to multi-item settings has proven exceptionally challenging. Even under restrictive assumptions, closed-form characterizations of optimal mechanisms are rare and are largely confined to the single-agent case, departing from the two-item setting only when prior distributions are uniformly distributed. In this work, we build upon the bi-valued setting introduced by Yao (EC 2017), where each item’s value has support 2 and lies in \(\{a,b\}\). Yao’s result provides the only known closed-form optimal mechanism for multiple agents. We extend this line of work along three natural axes, establishing the first closed-form optimal mechanisms in each of the following settings: (i) \(n\) i.i.d. agents and \(m\) i.i.d. items, (ii) \(n\) non-i.i.d. agents and two i.i.d. items, and (iii) \(n\) i.i.d. agents and two non-i.i.d. items. Our results lie at the limit of what is considered possible, since even with a single agent and \(m\) bi-valued non-i.i.d. items, finding the optimal mechanism is #P-Hard. We finally generalize the discrete analog of a result from Daskalakis et al. (Econometrica 2017), showing that for a single agent with \(m\) items drawn from arbitrary (non-identical) discrete distributions, grand bundling is optimal when all item values are sufficiently large. We further show that for any continuous product distribution, grand bundling achieves \(\mathsf{OPT} - \epsilon\) revenue for large enough values.
Marios Mertzanidis, Athina Terzoglou
SODA2
2023 On the Robustness of Mechanism Design under Total Variation Distance
abstract
We study the problem of designing mechanisms when agents' valuation functions are drawn from unknown and correlated prior distributions. In particular, we are given a prior distribution $D$, and we are interested in designing a (truthful) mechanism that has good performance for all "true distributions" that are close to $D$ in Total Variation (TV) distance. We show that DSIC and BIC mechanisms in this setting are strongly robust with respect to TV distance, for any bounded objective function $\mathcal{O}$, extending a recent result of Brustle et al. ([BCD20], EC 2020). At the heart of our result is a fundamental duality property of total variation distance. As direct applications of our result, we (i) demonstrate how to find approximately revenue-optimal and approximately BIC mechanisms for weakly dependent prior distributions; (ii) show how to find correlation-robust mechanisms when only ``noisy'' versions of marginals are accessible, extending recent results of Bei et. al. ([BGLT19], SODA 2019); (iii) prove that prophet-inequality type guarantees are preserved for correlated priors, recovering a variant of a result of D{\"u}tting and Kesselheim ([DK19], EC 2019) as a special case; (iv) give a new necessary condition for a correlated distribution to witness an infinite separation in revenue between simple and optimal mechanisms, complementing recent results of Psomas et al. ([PSCW22], NeurIPS 2022); (v) give a new condition for simple mechanisms to approximate revenue-optimal mechanisms for the case of a single agent whose type is drawn from a correlated distribution that can be captured by a Markov Random Field, complementing recent results of Cai and Oikonomou ([CO21], EC 2021).
Anuran Makur, Marios Mertzanidis, Christos-Alexandros Psomas, Athina Terzoglou
NeurIPS4