Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alon Beck

dblp:359/4587 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 53% Learning theory · 47%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
grokking
1.622025
Grokking at the Edge of Linear Separability · ICML 2025
Grokking in Linear Estimators - A Solvable Model that Groks without Understanding · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › implicit bias
implicit bias of gradient descent
0.912025
Grokking at the Edge of Linear Separability · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.812024
Grokking in Linear Estimators - A Solvable Model that Groks without Understanding · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.212024
Grokking in Linear Estimators - A Solvable Model that Groks without Understanding · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logistic regression analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Grokking at the Edge of Linear Separability
abstract
We investigate the phenomenon of grokking -- delayed generalization accompanied by non-monotonic test loss behavior -- in a simple binary logistic classification task, for which "memorizing" and "generalizing" solutions can be strictly defined. Surprisingly, we find that grokking arises naturally even in this minimal model when the parameters of the problem are close to a critical point, and provide both empirical and analytical insights into its mechanism. Concretely, by appealing to the implicit bias of gradient descent, we show that logistic regression can exhibit grokking when the training dataset is nearly linearly separable from the origin and there is strong noise in the perpendicular directions. The underlying reason is that near the critical point, "flat" directions in the loss landscape with nearly zero gradient cause training dynamics to linger for arbitrarily long times near quasi-stable solutions before eventually reaching the global minimum. Finally, we highlight similarities between our findings and the recent literature, strengthening the conjecture that grokking generally occurs in proximity to the interpolation threshold, reminiscent of critical phenomena often observed in physical systems.
Alon Beck, Noam Itzhak Levi, Yohai Bar-Sinai
ICML1
2024 Grokking in Linear Estimators - A Solvable Model that Groks without Understanding
abstract
Grokking is the intriguing phenomenon where a model learns to generalize long after it has fit the training data. We show both analytically and numerically that grokking can surprisingly occur in linear networks performing linear tasks in a simple teacher-student setup. In this setting, the full training dynamics is derived in terms of the expected training and generalization data covariance matrix. We present exact predictions on how the grokking time depends on input and output dimensionality, train sample size, regularization, and network parameters initialization. The key findings are that late generalization increase may not imply a transition from "memorization" to "understanding", but can simply be an artifact of the accuracy measure. We provide empirical verification for these propositions, along with preliminary results indicating that some predictions also hold for deeper networks, with non-linear activations.
Noam Itzhak Levi, Alon Beck, Yohai Bar-Sinai
ICLR2