Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maria R. Valentini
dblp:359/5810
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 60% Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Machine translation · 9% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Massively Multilingual Joint Segmentation and Glossing · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text simplification
lexical simplification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Automatic Generation and Simplification of Children's Stories · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Automatic Generation and Simplification of Children's Stories · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
text simplification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Automatic Generation and Simplification of Children's Stories · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
low-resource machine translation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Massively Multilingual Joint Segmentation and Glossing · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multilingual modeling · 1.0large language model · 0.7fine-tuning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Massively Multilingual Joint Segmentation and GlossingabstractMichael Ginn, Lindia Tjuatja, Enora Rice, Ali Marashian, Maria Valentini, Jasmine Xu, Graham Neubig, Alexis Palmer. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Michael Ginn, Lindia Tjuatja, Enora Rice, Ali Marashian, Maria R. Valentini, Jasmine Xu, Graham Neubig, Alexis Palmer |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2025 | Measuring Contextual Informativeness in Child-Directed TextabstractTo address an important gap in creating children’s stories for vocabulary enrichment, we investigate the automatic evaluation of how well stories convey the semantics of target vocabulary words, a task with substantial implications for generating educational content. We motivate this task, which we call measuring contextual informativeness in children’s stories, and provide a formal task definition as well as a dataset for the task. We further propose a method for automating the task using a large language model (LLM). Our experiments show that our approach reaches a Spearman correlation of 0.4983 with human judgments of informativeness, while the strongest baseline only obtains a correlation of 0.3534. An additional analysis shows that the LLM-based approach is able to generalize to measuring contextual informativeness in adult-directed text, on which it also outperforms all baselines. Maria R. Valentini, Téa Wright, Ali Marashian, Jennifer Weber, Eliana Colunga, Katharina von der Wense |
COLING | 1 |
| 2024 | Evaluating LLMs as Tools to Support Early Vocabulary Learning
Jennifer Weber, Maria R. Valentini, Téa Wright, Katharina von der Wense, Eliana Colunga |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2023 | On the Automatic Generation and Simplification of Children's StoriesabstractWith recent advances in large language models (LLMs), the concept of automatically generating children's educational materials has become increasingly realistic.Working toward the goal of age-appropriate simplicity in generated educational texts, we first examine the ability of several popular LLMs to generate stories with properly adjusted lexical and readability levels.We find that, in spite of the growing capabilities of LLMs, they do not yet possess the ability to limit their vocabulary to levels appropriate for younger age groups.As a second experiment, we explore the ability of state-ofthe-art lexical simplification models to generalize to the domain of children's stories and, thus, create an efficient pipeline for their automatic generation.In order to test these models, we develop a dataset of child-directed lexical simplification instances, with examples taken from the LLM-generated stories in our first experiment.We find that, while the strongest-performing lexical simplification models do not perform as well on material designed for children due to their reliance on LLMs, a model that performs well on general data strongly improves its performance on children-directed data with proper finetuning, which we conduct using our newly created child-directed simplification dataset. Maria R. Valentini, Jennifer Weber, Jesus Salcido, Téa Wright, Eliana Colunga, Katharina von der Wense |
EMNLP | 1 |