Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qinlin Zhao
dblp:359/6309
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 43% Multi-agent systems · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | PromptBench: A Unified Library for Evaluation of Large Language Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models by Meta Probing Agents · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PromptBench: A Unified Library for Evaluation of Large Language Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › agent-based simulation
agent-based social simulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CompeteAI: Understanding the Competition Dynamics of Large Language Model-based Agents · ICML 2024 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
science of science |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sociological theory modeling · 1.5simulation · 1.5large language model agents · 1.5GPT-4 · 1.5psychometrics-inspired probing · 0.8prompt engineering · 0.8dynamic evaluation protocol · 0.8agent-based evaluation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM AgentsabstractPeer review is fundamental to the integrity and advancement of scientific publication.Traditional methods of peer review analyses often rely on exploration and statistics of existing peer review data, which do not adequately address the multivariate nature of the process, account for the latent variables, and are further constrained by privacy concerns due to the sensitive nature of the data.We introduce AGENTREVIEW, the first large language model (LLM) based peer review simulation framework, which effectively disentangles the impacts of multiple latent factors and addresses the privacy issue.Our study reveals significant insights, including a notable 37.1% variation in paper decisions due to reviewers' biases, supported by sociological theories such as the social influence theory, altruism fatigue, and authority bias.We believe that this study could offer valuable insights to improve the design of peer review mechanisms.Our code is available at https://github.com/Ahren09/AgentReview. Yiqiao Jin, Qinlin Zhao, Hao Chen 0102, Kaijie Zhu, Yijia Xiao, Jindong Wang 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2024 | CompeteAI: Understanding the Competition Dynamics of Large Language Model-based AgentsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have been widely used as agents to complete different tasks, such as personal assistance or event planning. Although most of the work has focused on cooperation and collaboration between agents, little work explores competition, another important mechanism that promotes the development of society and economy. In this paper, we seek to examine the competition dynamics in LLM-based agents. We first propose a general framework for studying the competition between agents. Then, we implement a practical competitive environment using GPT-4 to simulate a virtual town with two types of agents, including restaurant agents and customer agents. Specifically, the restaurant agents compete with each other to attract more customers, where competition encourages them to transform, such as cultivating new operating strategies. Simulation experiments reveal several interesting findings at the micro and macro levels, which align well with existing market and sociological theories. We hope that the framework and environment can be a promising testbed to study the competition that fosters understanding of society. Code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/competeai. Qinlin Zhao, Jindong Wang 0001, Yixuan Zhang 0001, Yiqiao Jin, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen 0102, Xing Xie 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models by Meta Probing AgentsabstractEvaluation of large language models (LLMs) has raised great concerns in the community due to the issue of data contamination. Existing work designed evaluation protocols using well-defined algorithms for specific tasks, which cannot be easily extended to diverse scenarios. Moreover, current evaluation benchmarks can only provide the overall benchmark results and cannot support a fine-grained and multifaceted analysis of LLMs’ abilities. In this paper, we propose meta probing agents (MPA), a general dynamic evaluation protocol inspired by psychometrics to evaluate LLMs. MPA designs the probing and judging agents to automatically transform an original evaluation problem into a new one following psychometric theory on three basic cognitive abilities: language understanding, problem solving, and domain knowledge. These basic abilities are also dynamically configurable, allowing multifaceted analysis. We conducted extensive evaluations using MPA and found that most LLMs achieve poorer performance, indicating room for improvement. Our multifaceted analysis demonstrated the strong correlation between the basic abilities and an implicit Mattew effect on model size, i.e., larger models possess stronger correlations of the abilities. MPA can also be used as a data augmentation approach to enhance LLMs. Code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/promptbench. Kaijie Zhu, Jindong Wang 0001, Qinlin Zhao, Ruochen Xu, Xing Xie 0001 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | PromptBench: A Unified Library for Evaluation of Large Language ModelsabstractThe evaluation of large language models (LLMs) is crucial to assess their performance and mitigate potential security risks. In this paper, we introduce PromptBench, a unified library to evaluate LLMs. It consists of several key components that can be easily used and extended by researchers: prompt construction, prompt engineering, dataset and model loading, adversarial prompt attack, dynamic evaluation protocols, and analysis tools. PromptBench is designed as an open, general, and flexible codebase for research purpose. It aims to facilitate original study in creating new benchmarks, deploying downstream applications, and designing new evaluation protocols. The code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/promptbench and will be continuously supported. Kaijie Zhu, Qinlin Zhao, Hao Chen 0102, Jindong Wang 0001, Xing Xie 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |