Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Saba Sturua
dblp:359/6402
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-4367-9998ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
text embedding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | jina-embeddings-v5-text: Compact and Robust Text Embedding Models using Task-Targeted Distillation · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
text embedding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | jina-embeddings-v5-text: Compact and Robust Text Embedding Models using Task-Targeted Distillation · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
embedding evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hard negative sampling · 1.7benchmark downsampling · 1.7knowledge distillation · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0binary quantization · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | jina-embeddings-v5-text: Compact and Robust Text Embedding Models using Task-Targeted DistillationabstractMany enterprise search applications require small, efficient embedding models with strong performance on varying downstream tasks. In this paper, we present a pair of new embedding models trained with a novel training regimen that combines model distillation with task-specific contrastive losses. The resulting models are compact, general-purpose text embedding models that match or surpass the performance of existing models of similar size. Furthermore, we study the impact of training using a regularization strategy designed to make embeddings more robust under binary quantization. Our approach yields highly compact models suitable for resource-constrained deployment. All weights are publicly released to foster further research. Mohammad Kalim Akram, Saba Sturua, Nastia Havriushenko, Quentin Herreros, Michael Günther 0002, Maximilian Werk, Han Xiao 0002 |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2025 | Jina Embeddings V3: Multilingual Text Encoder with Low-Rank Adaptations
Saba Sturua, Isabelle Mohr, Mohammad Kalim Akram, Michael Günther 0002, Bo Wang 0096, Markus Krimmel, Georgios Mastrapas, Andreas Koukounas, Han Xiao 0002 |
ECIR (5) | 1 |
| 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding BenchmarkabstractText embeddings are typically evaluated on a narrow set of tasks, limited in terms of languages, domains, and task types. To circumvent this limitation and to provide a more comprehensive evaluation, we introduce the Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark (MMTEB) -- a large-scale community-driven initiative expanding MTEB to over 500 quality-controlled evaluation tasks across 1,000+ languages. MMTEB includes a wide range of challenging novel tasks such as instruction following, long-document retrieval, and code retrieval, and represents the largest multilingual collection of evaluation tasks for embedding models to date. We use this collection to construct multiple highly multilingual benchmarks. We evaluate a representative set of models on these benchmarks.
Our findings indicate that, while LLM-based models can achieve state-of-the-art performance on a subset of languages, the best-performing publicly available model across languages is the notably smaller, multilingual-e5-large-instruct.
Massive benchmarks often impose high computational demands, limiting accessibility, particularly for low-resource communities. To address this, we downsample tasks based on inter-task correlation (i.e., selecting only a diverse set of tasks) while preserving relative rankings.
We further optimize tasks such as retrieval by sampling hard negatives, creating smaller but effective splits. These optimizations allow us to introduce benchmarks at a significantly lower computational cost. For instance, we introduce a new zero-shot English benchmark that maintains a similar ordering at a fraction of the cost. Kenneth C. Enevoldsen, Isaac Chung, Imene Kerboua, Márton Kardos, Ashwin Mathur, David Stap, Jay Gala, Wissam Siblini, Dominik Krzeminski, Genta Indra Winata, Saba Sturua, Saiteja Utpala, Mathieu Ciancone, Marion Schaeffer, Diganta Misra, Shreeya Dhakal, Jonathan Rystrøm, Roman Solomatin, Omer Veysel Cagatan, Akash Kundu |
ICLR | 11 |