Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Shima Kheradmand

dblp:36/11406 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-7964-0409ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory
source coding
1.132024
Improved Upper Bounds on the Average Redundancy of Optimal RVLC · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
The Redundancy of an Optimal Binary Fix-Free Code Is Not Greater Than 1 bit · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015
Some Upper Bounds on the Redundancy of Optimal Binary Fix-Free Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012
Coding theory › source coding › universal coding
redundancy bounds
1.022024
Improved Upper Bounds on the Average Redundancy of Optimal RVLC · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
The Redundancy of an Optimal Binary Fix-Free Code Is Not Greater Than 1 bit · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015
Coding theory › source coding › variable-length codes
reversible variable-length codes
0.812024
Improved Upper Bounds on the Average Redundancy of Optimal RVLC · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Coding theory › source coding
variable-length codes
0.812024
Improved Upper Bounds on the Average Redundancy of Optimal RVLC · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › uniquely decodable codes
fix-free codes
0.422015
The Redundancy of an Optimal Binary Fix-Free Code Is Not Greater Than 1 bit · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015
Some Upper Bounds on the Redundancy of Optimal Binary Fix-Free Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012
Coding theory › source coding › variable-length codes › prefix codes
huffman coding
0.212024
Improved Upper Bounds on the Average Redundancy of Optimal RVLC · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

upper bound derivation · 0.8asymptotic analysis · 0.8sufficient conditions for fix-free codes · 0.23/4-conjecture · 0.2kraft-sum analysis · 0.1huffman coding · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Improved Upper Bounds on the Average Redundancy of Optimal RVLC
abstract
It is shown that efficient reversible variable length codes (RVLCs) with numerous codewords can be obtained if suboptimal RVLCs for the average distributions of monotone sources with relatively small alphabet sizes are multiplied by some fixed-length codes. Employing these RVLCs, the best known upper bounds on the average redundancy of optimal RVLC are almost halved. In particular, it is proved that the average redundancy of optimal RVLC for sources withnsymbols is less than 11/n+0.11345 bits forn> 32. Some other upper bounds are also derived which are either suboptimal in some sense for smallnor easily computable for largenor descriptive of asymptotic behavior. Moreover, we prove that the penalty of using optimal RVLC instead of Huffman code is less than 0.0848 bits for almost all sources with sufficiently large alphabet size. These results provide stronger evidence that, overall, the cost of benefiting from the desired properties of RVLC is not significant in terms of the redundancy.
Shima Kheradmand, Mohammadali Khosravifard, Sayed Jalal Zahabi, Hamed Narimani
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
2015 The Redundancy of an Optimal Binary Fix-Free Code Is Not Greater Than 1 bit
abstract
In the context of fix-free codes, the most important and immediate consequence of the 3/4-conjecture (if it is proven), is that the redundancy of an optimal binary fix-free code never exceeds 1 bit, as with the optimal prefix-free codes, i.e. Huffman codes. In this paper, this bound on the redundancy is proven without requiring the conjecture to be true. To do so, we use two known sufficient conditions for the existence of binary fix-free codes to derive an improved upper bound on the redundancy of an optimal fix-free code in terms of the largest symbol probability.
Shima Kheradmand, Mohammadali Khosravifard, T. Aaron Gulliver
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2012 Some Upper Bounds on the Redundancy of Optimal Binary Fix-Free Codes
abstract
In order to investigate the cost of employing fix-free codes instead of the well-established prefix-free codes, some upper bounds on the redundancy of the optimal fix-free codes and their difference with the corresponding Huffman codes are presented. Unlike the conventional approach, which is based on some Shannon-like suboptimal codes, we examine the redundancy of a better Huffman-like code. An algorithm is proposed for deriving optimal binary codeword lengths with Kraft-sum [5/8] for a given probability distribution. The existence of a fix-free code with such codelengths is guaranteed by Yekhanin's theorem. It is shown that the redundancy of this fix-free code is, at most, 0.8 bit greater than that of the Huffman code and does not exceed [8/3]-log3 ≅ 1.0817 bits. This upper bound is [4/3]-log[5/3] ≅0.5964 bit less than the best known one. If the [3/4]-conjecture is proved sometime in the future, the presented upper bound on the redundancy of the optimal fix-free codes (i.e., 1.0817) will be improved by only [5/3]-log3 ≅ 0.0817 . In addition to these general bounds, all known upper bounds in terms of the largest, the smallest, and an arbitrary given symbol probability are substantially improved.
Mohammadali Khosravifard, Shima Kheradmand
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2