Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Frank Moosmann
dblp:36/2651
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
3D vision · 56% Video understanding and tracking · 18% Autonomous driving · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LISO: Lidar-Only Self-supervised 3D Object Detection · ECCV (86) 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.5 | 2 | 2021 | SLIM: Self-Supervised LiDAR Scene Flow and Motion Segmentation · ICCV 2021 Motion estimation from range images in dynamic outdoor scenes · ICRA 2010 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SLIM: Self-Supervised LiDAR Scene Flow and Motion Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › scene flow estimation
LiDAR scene flow |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SLIM: Self-Supervised LiDAR Scene Flow and Motion Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
motion segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SLIM: Self-Supervised LiDAR Scene Flow and Motion Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
scene flow estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SLIM: Self-Supervised LiDAR Scene Flow and Motion Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Joint self-localization and tracking of generic objects in 3D range data · ICRA 2013 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
moving object detection and tracking |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Joint self-localization and tracking of generic objects in 3D range data · ICRA 2013 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Joint self-localization and tracking of generic objects in 3D range data · ICRA 2013 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Randomized Clustering Forests for Image Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008 Fast Discriminative Visual Codebooks using Randomized Clustering Forests · NIPS 2006 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Automatic camera and range sensor calibration using a single shot · ICRA 2012 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
motion estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Motion estimation from range images in dynamic outdoor scenes · ICRA 2010 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Motion estimation from range images in dynamic outdoor scenes · ICRA 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
content-based image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Randomized Clustering Forests for Image Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Randomized Clustering Forests for Image Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation › image representation
visual vocabulary |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Fast Discriminative Visual Codebooks using Randomized Clustering Forests · NIPS 2006 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis
shape estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Joint self-localization and tracking of generic objects in 3D range data · ICRA 2013 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor calibration |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Automatic camera and range sensor calibration using a single shot · ICRA 2012 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Fast Discriminative Visual Codebooks using Randomized Clustering Forests · NIPS 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 1.3kabsch algorithm · 0.5vector quantization · 0.2time-of-flight camera · 0.2multi-layer laser scanning · 0.2joint estimation · 0.2checkerboard corner detector · 0.1camera-to-range registration · 0.1dynamic mapping · 0.16-DOF motion estimation · 0.1randomized clustering forests · 0.1SVM · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | LISO: Lidar-Only Self-supervised 3D Object Detection
Stefan A. Baur, Frank Moosmann, Andreas Geiger 0001 |
ECCV (86) | 2 |
| 2021 | SLIM: Self-Supervised LiDAR Scene Flow and Motion SegmentationabstractRecently, several frameworks for self-supervised learning of 3D scene flow on point clouds have emerged. Scene flow inherently separates every scene into multiple moving agents and a large class of points following a single rigid sensor motion. However, existing methods do not leverage this property of the data in their self-supervised training routines which could improve and stabilize flow predictions. Based on the discrepancy between a robust rigid egomotion estimate and a raw flow prediction, we generate a self-supervised motion segmentation signal. The predicted motion segmentation, in turn, is used by our algorithm to attend to stationary points for aggregation of motion information in static parts of the scene. We learn our model end-to-end by backpropagating gradients through Kabsch’s algorithm and demonstrate that this leads to accurate egomotion which in turn improves the scene flow estimate. Using our method, we show state-of-the-art results across multiple scene flow metrics for different real-world datasets, showcasing the robustness and generalizability of this approach. We further analyze the performance gain when performing joint motion segmentation and scene flow in an ablation study. We also present a novel network architecture for 3D LiDAR scene flow which is capable of handling an order of magnitude more points during training than previously possible. Stefan A. Baur, David Emmerichs, Frank Moosmann, Peter Pinggera, Björn Ommer, Andreas Geiger 0001 |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2019 | Real-time 3D LiDAR Flow for Autonomous VehiclesabstractAutonomous vehicles require an accurate understanding of the underlying motion of their surroundings. Traditionally this understanding is acquired using optical flow algorithms on camera images, RADAR sensors which measure velocity directly or by object tracking through various sensors. We propose a novel method to estimate point-wise 3D motion vectors from LiDAR point clouds using fully convolutional networks trained and evaluated on the KITTI dataset. Besides, we show how this motion information can be used to efficiently estimate odometry. We demonstrate that our approach achieves significant speed ups over the current state of the art. Stefan A. Baur, Frank Moosmann, Sascha Wirges, Christoph Rist |
IV | 2 |
| 2013 | Joint self-localization and tracking of generic objects in 3D range dataabstractBoth, the estimation of the trajectory of a sensor and the detection and tracking of moving objects are essential tasks for autonomous robots. This work proposes a new algorithm that treats both problems jointly. The sole input is a sequence of dense 3D measurements as returned by multi-layer laser scanners or time-of-flight cameras. A major characteristic of the proposed approach is its applicability to any type of environment since specific object models are not used at any algorithm stage. More specifically, precise localization in non-flat environments is possible as well as the detection and tracking of e.g. trams or recumbent bicycles. Moreover, 3D shape estimation of moving objects is inherent to the proposed method. Thorough evaluation is conducted on a vehicular platform with a mounted Velodyne HDL-64E laser scanner. Frank Moosmann, Christoph Stiller |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2012 | Automatic camera and range sensor calibration using a single shotabstractAs a core robotic and vision problem, camera and range sensor calibration have been researched intensely over the last decades. However, robotic research efforts still often get heavily delayed by the requirement of setting up a calibrated system consisting of multiple cameras and range measurement units. With regard to removing this burden, we present a toolbox with web interface for fully automatic camera-to-camera and camera-to-range calibration. Our system is easy to setup and recovers intrinsic and extrinsic camera parameters as well as the transformation between cameras and range sensors within one minute. In contrast to existing calibration approaches, which often require user intervention, the proposed method is robust to varying imaging conditions, fully automatic, and easy to use since a single image and range scan proves sufficient for most calibration scenarios. Experimentally, we demonstrate that the proposed checkerboard corner detector significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art. Furthermore, the proposed camera-to-range registration method is able to discover multiple solutions in the case of ambiguities. Experiments using a variety of sensors such as grayscale and color cameras, the Kinect 3D sensor and the Velodyne HDL-64 laser scanner show the robustness of our method in different indoor and outdoor settings and under various lighting conditions. Andreas Geiger 0001, Frank Moosmann, Omer Car, Bernhard Schuster |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2012 | Team AnnieWAY's Entry to the 2011 Grand Cooperative Driving ChallengeabstractIn this paper, we present the concepts and methods developed for the autonomous vehicle known as AnnieWAY, which is our winning entry to the 2011 Grand Cooperative Driving Challenge. We describe algorithms for sensor fusion, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, and cooperative control. Furthermore, we analyze the performance of the proposed methods and compare them with those of competing teams. We close with our results from the competition and lessons learned. Andreas Geiger 0001, Martin Lauer, Frank Moosmann, Benjamin Ranft, Holger H. Rapp, Christoph Stiller, Julius Ziegler |
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. | 3 |
| 2011 | Velodyne SLAMabstractEstimating a vehicles' own trajectory and generating precise maps of the environment are both important tasks for intelligent vehicles. Especially for the second task laser scanners are the sensor of choice as they provide precise range measurements. This work proposes an approach for simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) specifically designed for the Velodyne HDL-64E laser scanner which exhibits characteristics not present in most other systems. This comprises the continuous, spinning data acquisition and the relative high sensor noise. Together, these make standard SLAM approaches generate noisy maps and inaccurate trajectories. We show that it is possible to generate precise maps and localize therein in spite of not using wheel speed sensors or other information. The presented approach is evaluated on a novel, challenging 3D data set being made publicly available. Frank Moosmann, Christoph Stiller |
Intelligent Vehicles Symposium | 1 |
| 2010 | Motion estimation from range images in dynamic outdoor scenesabstractObject-class independent motion estimation from range data is a challenging task. We present here a novel approach that is able to derive a dense motion field based on range images only. We propose to first segment the range image into segments using a recently proposed segmentation criterion. Motion is then estimated segment-wise with full 6 degrees of freedom. To that end, we introduce dynamic mapping, i.e. the accumulation of measurements for moving objects. We show experimentally that the approach is able to deliver a dense motion field which can then be used for object-class independent trajectory estimation. Frank Moosmann, Thierry Fraichard |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2010 | Moving on to dynamic environments: Visual odometry using feature classificationabstractVisually estimating a robot's own motion has been an active field of research within the last years. Though impressive results have been reported, some application areas still exhibit huge challenges. Especially for car-like robots in urban environments even the most robust estimation techniques fail due to a vast portion of independently moving objects. Hence, we move one step further and propose a method that combines ego-motion estimation with low-level object detection. We specifically design the method to be general and applicable in real-time. Pre-classifying interest points is a key step, which rejects matches on possibly moving objects and reduces the computational load of further steps. Employing an Iterated Sigma Point Kalman Filter in combination with a RANSAC based outlier rejection scheme yields a robust frame-to-frame motion estimation even in the case when many independently moving objects cover the image. Extensive experiments show the robustness of the proposed approach in highly dynamic environments with speeds up to 20m/s. Bernd Kitt, Frank Moosmann, Christoph Stiller |
IROS | 2 |
| 2008 | Randomized Clustering Forests for Image ClassificationabstractSome of the most effective recent methods for content-based image classification work by quantizing image descriptors, and accumulating histograms of the resulting visual word codes. Large numbers of descriptors and large codebooks are required for good results and this becomes slow using k-means. We introduce Extremely Randomized Clustering Forests ensembles of randomly created clustering trees and show that they provide more accurate results, much faster training and testing, and good resistance to background clutter. Second, an efficient image classification method is proposed. It combines ERC-Forests and saliency maps very closely with the extraction of image information. For a given image, a classifier builds a saliency map online and uses it to classify the image. We show in several state-of-the-art image classification tasks that this method can speed up the classification process enormously. Finally, we show that the proposed ERC-Forests can also be used very successfully for learning distance between images. The distance computation algorithm consists of learning the characteristic differences between local descriptors sampled from pairs of same or different objects. These differences are vector quantized by ERC-Forests and the similarity measure is computed from this quantization. The similarity measure has been evaluated on four very different datasets and always outperforms the state-of-the-art competitive approaches. Frank Moosmann, Eric Nowak, Frédéric Jurie |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2006 | Fast Discriminative Visual Codebooks using Randomized Clustering ForestsabstractSome of the most effective recent methods for content-based image classification work by extracting dense or sparse local image descriptors, quantizing them according to a coding rule such as k-means vector quantization, accumulating histograms of the resulting "visual word" codes over the image, and classifying these with a conventional classifier such as an SVM. Large numbers of descriptors and large codebooks are needed for good results and this becomes slow using k-means. We introduce Extremely Randomized Clustering Forests ensembles of randomly created clustering trees and show that these provide more accurate results, much faster training and testing and good resistance to background clutter in several state-of-the-art image classification tasks. Frank Moosmann, Bill Triggs, Frédéric Jurie |
NIPS | 1 |