Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter Johnstone

dblp:36/2775 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.012004
Normalization of microarray data using a spatial mixed model analysis which includes splines · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012004
Normalization of microarray data using a spatial mixed model analysis which includes splines · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
microarray data normalization
0.012004
Normalization of microarray data using a spatial mixed model analysis which includes splines · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

splines · 0.0spatial mixed model · 0.0loess normalization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Normalization of microarray data using a spatial mixed model analysis which includes splines
abstract
MOTIVATION: Microarray experiments with thousands of genes on a slide and multiple slides used in any experimental set represent a large body of data with many sources of variation. The identification of such sources of variation within microarray experimental sets is critical for correct deciphering of desired gene expression differences. RESULTS: We describe new methods for the normalization using spatial mixed models which include splines and analysis of two-colour spotted microarrays for within slide variation and for a series of slides. The model typically explains 45-85% of the variation on a slide with only approximately 1% of the total degrees of freedom. The results from our methods compare favourably with those from intensity dependent normalization loess methods where we accounted for twice as much uncontrolled and unwanted variation on the slides. We have also developed an index for each EST that combines the various measures of the differential response into a single value that researchers can use to rapidly assess the genes of interest.
David Baird, Peter Johnstone, Theresa Wilson
Bioinform.2