Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sushil Mittal

dblp:36/367 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 41% Video understanding and tracking · 38% Optimization for machine learning · 22%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation
0.322012
Generalized Projection-Based M-Estimator · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Generalized projection based M-estimator: Theory and applications · CVPR 2011
Data mining
clustering
0.212014
Semi-Supervised Kernel Mean Shift Clustering · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Data mining › clustering › density-based clustering › mode seeking
mean shift clustering
0.212014
Semi-Supervised Kernel Mean Shift Clustering · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Data mining › clustering
semi-supervised clustering
0.212014
Semi-Supervised Kernel Mean Shift Clustering · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
m-estimator
0.112012
Generalized Projection-Based M-Estimator · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
motion segmentation
0.112011
Generalized projection based M-estimator: Theory and applications · CVPR 2011
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion segmentation
multi-body motion segmentation
0.112011
Generalized projection based M-estimator: Theory and applications · CVPR 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pairwise constraints · 0.2logdet divergence · 0.2kernel mean shift · 0.2projection-based estimation · 0.1grassmann manifold · 0.1scale estimation · 0.1m-estimation · 0.1inlier/outlier dichotomy · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Robust Multi-Model Fitting Using Density and Preference Analysis
Lokender Tiwari, Saket Anand, Sushil Mittal
ACCV (4)3
2014 Semi-Supervised Kernel Mean Shift Clustering
abstract
Mean shift clustering is a powerful nonparametric technique that does not require prior knowledge of the number of clusters and does not constrain the shape of the clusters. However, being completely unsupervised, its performance suffers when the original distance metric fails to capture the underlying cluster structure. Despite recent advances in semi-supervised clustering methods, there has been little effort towards incorporating supervision into mean shift. We propose a semi-supervised framework for kernel mean shift clustering (SKMS) that uses only pairwise constraints to guide the clustering procedure. The points are first mapped to a high-dimensional kernel space where the constraints are imposed by a linear transformation of the mapped points. This is achieved by modifying the initial kernel matrix by minimizing a log det divergence-based objective function. We show the advantages of SKMS by evaluating its performance on various synthetic and real datasets while comparing with state-of-the-art semi-supervised clustering algorithms.
Saket Anand, Sushil Mittal, Oncel Tuzel, Peter Meer
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2012 Conjugate gradient on Grassmann manifolds for robust subspace estimation
Sushil Mittal, Peter Meer
Image Vis. Comput.1
2012 Generalized Projection-Based M-Estimator
abstract
We propose a novel robust estimation algorithm—the generalized projection-based M-estimator (gpbM), which does not require the user to specify any scale parameters. The algorithm is general and can handle heteroscedastic data with multiple linear constraints for single and multicarrier problems. The gpbM has three distinct stages—scale estimation, robust model estimation, and inlier/outlier dichotomy. In contrast, in its predecessor pbM, each model hypotheses was associated with a different scale estimate. For data containing multiple inlier structures with generally different noise covariances, the estimator iteratively determines one structure at a time. The model estimation can be further optimized by using Grassmann manifold theory. We present several homoscedastic and heteroscedastic synthetic and real-world computer vision problems with single and multiple carriers.
Sushil Mittal, Saket Anand, Peter Meer
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2011 Generalized projection based M-estimator: Theory and applications
abstract
We introduce a robust estimator called generalized projection based M-estimator (gpbM) which does not require the user to specify any scale parameters. For multiple inlier structures, with different noise covariances, the estimator iteratively determines one inlier structure at a time. Unlike pbM, where the scale of the inlier noise is estimated simultaneously with the model parameters, gpbM has three distinct stages-scale estimation, robust model estimation and inlier/outlier dichotomy. We evaluate our performance on challenging synthetic data, face image clustering upto ten different faces from Yale Face Database B and multi-body projective motion segmentation problem on Hopkins155 dataset. Results of state-of-the-art methods are presented for comparison.
Sushil Mittal, Saket Anand, Peter Meer
CVPR1
2011 Detection, Grading and Classification of Coronary Stenoses in Computed Tomography Angiography
B. Michael Kelm, Sushil Mittal, Yefeng Zheng 0001, Alexey Tsymbal, Dominik Bernhardt, Fernando Vega Higuera, Shaohua Kevin Zhou, Peter Meer, Dorin Comaniciu
MICCAI (3)2
2007 Sequential Decision Making Algorithms for Port of Entry Inspection: Overcoming Computational Challenges
abstract
Following work of Stroud and Saeger and Anand et al., we formulate a port of entry inspection sequencing task as a problem of finding an optimal binary decision tree for an appropriate Boolean decision function. We report on new algorithms that are more efficient computationally than those presented by Stroud and Saeger and Anand et al. We achieve these efficiencies through a combination of specific numerical methods for finding optimal thresholds for sensor functions and a novel binary decision tree search algorithm that operates on a space of potentially acceptable binary decision trees.
David Madigan, Sushil Mittal, Fred S. Roberts
ISI2