Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Subramanyam Sripada
dblp:36/370
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
timing analysis |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | A timing graph based approach to mode merging · DAC 2015 Automated timing model generation · DAC 2002 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | A timing graph based approach to mode merging · DAC 2015 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
timing verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | A timing graph based approach to mode merging · DAC 2015 |
Electronic design automation
design flow |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Automated timing model generation · DAC 2002 |
Electronic design automation › design methodology
hierarchical design |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Automated timing model generation · DAC 2002 |
Electronic design automation › system-level design
IP reuse |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Automated timing model generation · DAC 2002 |
Electronic design automation
timing model generation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Automated timing model generation · DAC 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
timing graph analysis · 0.2static timing analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | A timing graph based approach to mode mergingabstractWith shrinking technologies and increasing design complexities, it is common to have a large number of modes (functional, scan, test and so on) and corners (PVT device and interconnect). This leads to an explosion in the number of scenarios (#modes × #corners) that need to be validated for timing. While multiple tactics are required to handle this problem, one essential way to address this is by reducing the number of modes by merging individual modes into superset modes. However, with the overriding necessity to maintain sign-off accuracy, mode merging with high merge-factor is very complex. In this paper, we propose a novel automated timing graph based approach to mode merging that is designed to meet these requirements. By construction, there is an inbuilt validation that the merged constraints correctly model the intent of original constraints. This technology is tested on large industrial designs and the results are provided. Subramanyam Sripada, Murthy Palla |
DAC | 1 |
| 2002 | Automated timing model generationabstractThe automated generation of timing models from gate-level netlists facilitates IP reuse and dramatically improves chip-level STA runtime in a hierarchical design flow. In this paper we discuss two different approaches to model generation, the design flows they lend themselves to and results from the application of these model generation solutions to large customer designs. Ajay J. Daga, Loa Mize, Subramanyam Sripada, Chris Wolff, Qiuyang Wu |
DAC | 3 |