Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Angela Cox

dblp:36/5322 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-5138-1099ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genetic association study
0.112008
hapConstructor: automatic construction and testing of haplotypes in a Monte Carlo framework · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
haplotype analysis
0.112008
hapConstructor: automatic construction and testing of haplotypes in a Monte Carlo framework · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic association study
multi-locus association mapping
0.112008
hapConstructor: automatic construction and testing of haplotypes in a Monte Carlo framework · Bioinform. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monte carlo framework · 0.1missing data imputation · 0.1false discovery rate · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Iam hiQ - a novel pair of accuracy indices for imputed genotypes
abstract
BACKGROUND: Imputation of untyped markers is a standard tool in genome-wide association studies to close the gap between directly genotyped and other known DNA variants. However, high accuracy with which genotypes are imputed is fundamental. Several accuracy measures have been proposed and some are implemented in imputation software, unfortunately diversely across platforms. In the present paper, we introduce Iam hiQ, an independent pair of accuracy measures that can be applied to dosage files, the output of all imputation software. Iam (imputation accuracy measure) quantifies the average amount of individual-specific versus population-specific genotype information in a linear manner. hiQ (heterogeneity in quantities of dosages) addresses the inter-individual heterogeneity between dosages of a marker across the sample at hand. RESULTS: Applying both measures to a large case-control sample of the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO), comprising 27,065 individuals, we found meaningful thresholds for Iam and hiQ suitable to classify markers of poor accuracy. We demonstrate how Manhattan-like plots and moving averages of Iam and hiQ can be useful to identify regions enriched with less accurate imputed markers, whereas these regions would by missed when applying the accuracy measure info (implemented in IMPUTE2). CONCLUSION: We recommend using Iam hiQ additional to other accuracy scores for variant filtering before stepping into the analysis of imputed GWAS data.
Albert Rosenberger, Viola Tozzi, Heike Bickeböller, Rayjean J. Hung, David C. Christiani, Neil E. Caporaso, Geoffrey Liu, Stig E. Bojesen, Loic Le Marchand, Demetrios Albanes, Melinda Aldrich, Adonina Tardon, Guillermo Fernández-Tardón, Gad Rennert, John K. Field, Triantafillos Liloglou, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Philip Lazarus, Aage Haugen, Shanbeh Zienolddiny, Stephen Lam, Matthew B. Schabath, Angeline S. Andrew, Eric J. Duell, Susanne M. Arnold, Hans Brunnström, Olle Melander, Gary E. Goodman, Chu Chen, Jennifer A. Doherty, Marion Dawn Teare, Angela Cox, Penella J. Woll, Angela Risch, Thomas R. Muley, Paul Brennan, Maria Teresa Landi, Sanjay Shete, Christopher I. Amos
BMC Bioinform.33
2008 hapConstructor: automatic construction and testing of haplotypes in a Monte Carlo framework
abstract
SUMMARY: Haplotypes carry important information that can direct investigators towards underlying susceptibility variants, and hence multiple tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (tSNPs) are usually studied in candidate gene association studies. However, it is often unknown which SNPs should be included in haplotype analyses, or which tests should be performed for maximum power. We have developed a program, hapConstructor, which automatically builds multi-locus SNP sets to test for association in a case-control framework. The multi-SNP sets considered need not be contiguous; they are built based on significance. An important feature is that the missing data imputation is carried out based on the full data, for maximal information and consistency. HapConstructor is implemented in a Monte Carlo framework and naturally extends to allow for significance testing and false discovery rates that account for the construction process and to related individuals. HapConstructor is a useful tool for exploring multi-locus associations in candidate genes and regions. AVAILABILITY: http://www-genepi.med.utah.edu/Genie.
Ryan Abo, Stacey Knight, Jathine Wong, Angela Cox, Nicola J. Camp
Bioinform.4