Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Agnes Radl

dblp:36/5759 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 68% Algorithms and data structures · 32%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › markov chains
hitting time
0.212014
Hitting and commute times in large random neighborhood graphs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014
Graph algorithms and graph theory › metric graph theory
graph distance
0.112010
Getting lost in space: Large sample analysis of the resistance distance · NIPS 2010
Graph algorithms and graph theory › metric graph theory › graph distance
resistance distance
0.112010
Getting lost in space: Large sample analysis of the resistance distance · NIPS 2010
Graph data management
graph analytics
0.112014
Hitting and commute times in large random neighborhood graphs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral graph theory · 0.5markov chain analysis · 0.4random walk analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Hitting and commute times in large random neighborhood graphs
Ulrike von Luxburg, Agnes Radl, Matthias Hein 0001
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2010 Getting lost in space: Large sample analysis of the resistance distance
abstract
The commute distance between two vertices in a graph is the expected time it takes a random walk to travel from the first to the second vertex and back. We study the behavior of the commute distance as the size of the underlying graph increases. We prove that the commute distance converges to an expression that does not take into account the structure of the graph at all and that is completely meaningless as a distance function on the graph. Consequently, the use of the raw commute distance for machine learning purposes is strongly discouraged for large graphs and in high dimensions. As an alternative we introduce the amplified commute distance that corrects for the undesired large sample effects.
Ulrike von Luxburg, Agnes Radl, Matthias Hein 0001
NIPS2