Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nikunj R. Mehta

dblp:36/6360 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
0009-0006-8273-3209ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.132004
Modeling Behavior in Compositions of Software Architectural Primitives · ASE 2004
Composing architectural styles from architectural primitives · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2003
Towards a taxonomy of software connectors · ICSE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
architectural primitives
0.122004
Modeling Behavior in Compositions of Software Architectural Primitives · ASE 2004
Composing architectural styles from architectural primitives · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2003
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
architectural style
0.012003
Composing architectural styles from architectural primitives · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2003
Requirements engineering and software design › component-based software
software component interconnection
0.012000
Towards a taxonomy of software connectors · ICSE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
software connectors
0.012000
Towards a taxonomy of software connectors · ICSE 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

style composition · 0.0taxonomy construction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Modeling Behavior in Compositions of Software Architectural Primitives
Nikunj R. Mehta, Nenad Medvidovic, Marjan Sirjani, Farhad Arbab
ASE1
2003 Composing architectural styles from architectural primitives
abstract
Architectural styles are named collections of constraints on configurations of architectural elements, and are believed to bring economies of scale in applying software architecture techniques to software development. Existing research on architectural styles provides little guidance for the systematic design and construction of architectural style elements. This paper proposes a framework, Alfa, for systematically and constructively composing "architectural primitives" to obtain elements of architectural styles. This is based on our observation that architectural styles share many underlying concepts that lead to architectural primitives. We have identified eight forms and nine functions as architectural primitives that reflect the syntactic and semantic characteristics of architectural styles and are expressive enough to compose their elements. Our approach is also illustrated using a familiar style -- pipe-and-filter.
Nikunj R. Mehta, Nenad Medvidovic
ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE1
2002 A Family of Software Architecture Implementation Frameworks
Nenad Medvidovic, Nikunj R. Mehta, Marija Mikic-Rakic
WICSA2
2000 Towards a taxonomy of software connectors
abstract
Software systems of today are frequently composed from prefabricated, heterogeneous components that provide complex functionality and engage in complex interactions. Existing research on component-based development has mostly focused on component structure, interfaces, and functionality. Recently, software architecture has emerged as an area that also places significant importance on component interactions, embodied in the notion of software connectors. However, the current level of understanding and support for connectors has been insufficient. This has resulted in their inconsistent treatment and a notable lack of understanding of what the fundamental building blocks of software interaction are and how they can be composed into more complex interactions. This paper attempts to address this problem. It presents a comprehensive classification framework and taxonomy of software connectors. The taxonomy is obtained through an extensive analysis of existing component interactions. The taxonomy is used both to understand existing software connectors and to suggest new, unprecedented connectors. We demonstrate the use of the taxonomy on the architecture of a large, existing system.
Nikunj R. Mehta, Nenad Medvidovic, Sandeep Phadke
ICSE1