Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anna Molnar
dblp:36/641
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Towards New Measures of Information Retrieval Evaluation · SIGIR 1995 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
user-oriented evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Towards New Measures of Information Retrieval Evaluation · SIGIR 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
short-answer test · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | Towards New Measures of Information Retrieval EvaluationabstractAll of the methods cumently used to evaluate information retrieval (Ill) systems have limitations in their ability to measure how well users are able to acquire information.We utilized on approach to assessing information obtained based on the user's ability to answer qtrcstions from a shortanswer test.Senior medical students took the ten-question test and then searched one of (WO IR systems on the five questions for which they were least ccrtuin of their answer.Our results showed thtit pre-searching scores on the test were low but that searching yielded a high proportion of answers with both systems.These methods are able to measure information obtained, and will be used in subsequent studies to assess differences among IR systems.provide a starting point at determining the quantity of useful information ob[ained from an IR system.they say Pemlission to nmke digil:il/h:lrd copies u 1'all or port i) 1'tl)is m:ttcri:ll without fee is grontcd provided [Il:it the co}>ics :irc not ll]:l(jc or distributed for profit or commercini ~LiV:lllhgC, lllc ACM copyriglll/ server notice, the tillc of lhc pu[)]ic?:ltion Jnd i(s d;i[u :tppc:tr, :111'j notice is given that copyright is by permission of tllc Assi)ci:ltiol] for Computin William R. Hersh, Diane L. Elliot, David H. Hickam, Stephanie L. Wolf, Anna Molnar, Christine Leichtenstien |
SIGIR | 5 |