Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Peter J. Rousseeuw

dblp:36/906 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-3807-5353ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational geometry · 94% Approximation and online algorithms · 6%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network performance modeling · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network performance modeling › queueing analysis
multiplexer model
0.012003
Computing Packet Loss Probabilities in Multiplexer Models Using Rational Approximation · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003
Network performance modeling › packet loss
packet loss probability
0.012003
Computing Packet Loss Probabilities in Multiplexer Models Using Rational Approximation · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.012003
Computing Packet Loss Probabilities in Multiplexer Models Using Rational Approximation · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
single server queue
0.012003
Computing Packet Loss Probabilities in Multiplexer Models Using Rational Approximation · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003
Computational geometry › topological algorithms
topological sweep
0.012001
Fast implementation of depth contours using topological sweep · SODA 2001
Computational geometry › arrangement
hyperplane arrangement
0.011999
Efficient Algorithms for Maximum Regression Depth · SCG 1999
Computational geometry
regression depth
0.011999
Efficient Algorithms for Maximum Regression Depth · SCG 1999
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.011999
Efficient Algorithms for Maximum Regression Depth · SCG 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1rational approximation · 0.1matrix-analytic method · 0.1dual representation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Transforming variables to central normality
abstract
Abstract Many real data sets contain numerical features (variables) whose distribution is far from normal (Gaussian). Instead, their distribution is often skewed. In order to handle such data it is customary to preprocess the variables to make them more normal. The Box–Cox and Yeo–Johnson transformations are well-known tools for this. However, the standard maximum likelihood estimator of their transformation parameter is highly sensitive to outliers, and will often try to move outliers inward at the expense of the normality of the central part of the data. We propose a modification of these transformations as well as an estimator of the transformation parameter that is robust to outliers, so the transformed data can be approximately normal in the center and a few outliers may deviate from it. It compares favorably to existing techniques in an extensive simulation study and on real data.
Jakob Raymaekers, Peter J. Rousseeuw
Mach. Learn.2
2024 Fast linear model trees by PILOT
abstract
Abstract Linear model trees are regression trees that incorporate linear models in the leaf nodes. This preserves the intuitive interpretation of decision trees and at the same time enables them to better capture linear relationships, which is hard for standard decision trees. But most existing methods for fitting linear model trees are time consuming and therefore not scalable to large data sets. In addition, they are more prone to overfitting and extrapolation issues than standard regression trees. In this paper we introduce PILOT, a new algorithm for linear model trees that is fast, regularized, stable and interpretable. PILOT trains in a greedy fashion like classic regression trees, but incorporates an L 2 boosting approach and a model selection rule for fitting linear models in the nodes. The abbreviation PILOT stands for PIecewise Linear Organic Tree, where ‘organic’ refers to the fact that no pruning is carried out. PILOT has the same low time and space complexity as CART without its pruning. An empirical study indicates that PILOT tends to outperform standard decision trees and other linear model trees on a variety of data sets. Moreover, we prove its consistency in an additive model setting under weak assumptions. When the data is generated by a linear model, the convergence rate is polynomial.
Jakob Raymaekers, Peter J. Rousseeuw, Tim Verdonck, Ruicong Yao
Mach. Learn.2
2021 Fast and eager k-medoids clustering: O(k) runtime improvement of the PAM, CLARA, and CLARANS algorithms
abstract
Clustering non-Euclidean data is difficult, and one of the most used algorithms besides hierarchical clustering is the popular algorithm Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM), also simply referred to as k-medoids clustering. In Euclidean geometry the mean – as used in k-means – is a good estimator for the cluster center, but this does not exist for arbitrary dissimilarities. PAM uses the medoid instead, the object with the smallest dissimilarity to all others in the cluster. This notion of centrality can be used with any (dis-)similarity, and thus is of high relevance to many domains and applications. A key issue with PAM is its high run time cost. We propose modifications to the PAM algorithm that achieve an O(k)-fold speedup in the second (“SWAP”) phase of the algorithm, but will still find the same results as the original PAM algorithm. If we relax the choice of swaps performed (while retaining comparable quality), we can further accelerate the algorithm by eagerly performing additional swaps in each iteration. With the substantially faster SWAP, we can now explore faster initialization strategies, because (i) the classic (“BUILD”) initialization now becomes the bottleneck, and (ii) our swap is fast enough to compensate for worse starting conditions. We also show how the CLARA and CLARANS algorithms benefit from the proposed modifications. While we do not study the parallelization of our approach in this work, it can easily be combined with earlier approaches to use PAM and CLARA on big data (some of which use PAM as a subroutine, hence can immediately benefit from these improvements), where the performance with high k becomes increasingly important. In experiments on real data with k=100,200, we observed a 458× respectively 1191× speedup compared to the original PAM SWAP algorithm, making PAM applicable to larger data sets, and in particular to higher k.
Erich Schubert, Peter J. Rousseeuw
Inf. Syst.2
2019 Faster k-Medoids Clustering: Improving the PAM, CLARA, and CLARANS Algorithms
Erich Schubert, Peter J. Rousseeuw
SISAP2
2008 Efficient Algorithms for Maximum Regression Depth
abstract
We investigate algorithmic questions that arise in the statistical problem of computing lines or hyperplanes of maximum regression depth among a set of n points. We work primarily with a dual representation and find points of maximum undirected depth in an arrangement of lines or hyperplanes. An O(n d ) time and O(n d−1) space algorithm computes undirected depth of all points in d dimensions. Properties of undirected depth lead to an O(nlog 2 n) time and O(n) space algorithm for computing a point of maximum depth in two dimensions, which has been improved to an O(nlog n) time algorithm by Langerman and Steiger (Discrete Comput. Geom. 30(2):299–309, [2003]). Furthermore, we describe the structure of depth in the plane and higher dimensions, leading to various other geometric and algorithmic results.
Marc J. van Kreveld, Joseph S. B. Mitchell, Peter J. Rousseeuw, Micha Sharir, Jack Snoeyink, Bettina Speckmann
Discret. Comput. Geom.3
2006 Computing LTS Regression for Large Data Sets
Peter J. Rousseeuw, Katrien van Driessen
Data Min. Knowl. Discov.1
2003 Computing Packet Loss Probabilities in Multiplexer Models Using Rational Approximation
abstract
A statistical multiplexer is a basic model used in the design and the dimensioning of communication networks. The multiplexer model consists of a single server queue with constant service time and a more or less complicated arrival process. The aim is to determine the packet loss probability as a function of the capacity of the buffer. In this paper, we show how rational approximation techniques may be applied to compute the packet loss efficiently. The approach is based on the knowledge of a limited number of sample values, together with the decay rate of the probability distribution function. A strategy is proposed where the sample points are chosen automatically. The accuracy of the approach is validated by comparison with both analytical results obtained using a matrix-analytic method and simulation results.
Annie A. M. Cuyt, R. B. Lenin, Gert Willems, Chris Blondia, Peter J. Rousseeuw
IEEE Trans. Computers5
2001 Fast implementation of depth contours using topological sweep
Kim Miller, Suneeta Ramaswami, Peter J. Rousseeuw, Joan Antoni Sellarès, Diane L. Souvaine, Ileana Streinu, Anja Struyf
SODA3
1999 Efficient Algorithms for Maximum Regression Depth
abstract
We investigate algorithmic questions that arise in the statistical problem of computing lines or hyperplanes of maximum regression depth among a set of n points.We work primarily with a dual representation and find points of maximum undirected depth in an arrangement of lines or hyperplanes.An O(nd) time and space algorithm computes directed depth of all points in d dimensions.Properties of undirected depth lead to an O(n log2 n) time and O(n) space algorithm for computing a point of maximum depth in two dimensions.We also give approximation algorithms for hyperplane arrangements and degenerate line arrangements.
Marc J. van Kreveld, Joseph S. B. Mitchell, Peter J. Rousseeuw, Micha Sharir, Jack Snoeyink, Bettina Speckmann
SCG3
1999 Depth in an Arrangement of Hyperplanes
Peter J. Rousseeuw, Mia Hubert
Discret. Comput. Geom.1