VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
You-Liang Huang
dblp:360/4854
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0587-9571ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 78% Optimization for machine learning · 9% Representation and self-supervised learning · 9% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Recommender systems · 89% Information retrieval · 11% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
2.6 | 3 | 2025 | MoE-SVD: Structured Mixture-of-Experts LLMs Compression via Singular Value Decomposition · ICML 2025 Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Models Via Nested Low-Rank Adaptation · ICCV 2025 SoLA: Leveraging Soft Activation Sparsity and Low-Rank Decomposition for Large Language Model Compression · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
low-rank approximation |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | MoE-SVD: Structured Mixture-of-Experts LLMs Compression via Singular Value Decomposition · ICML 2025 SoLA: Leveraging Soft Activation Sparsity and Low-Rank Decomposition for Large Language Model Compression · AAAI 2025 |
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025 Is Contrastive Learning Necessary? A Study of Data Augmentation vs Contrastive Learning in Sequential Recommendation · WWW 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
activation sparsity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SoLA: Leveraging Soft Activation Sparsity and Low-Rank Decomposition for Large Language Model Compression · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
low-rank adaptation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Models Via Nested Low-Rank Adaptation · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › memory-efficient training
memory-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Efficient Low-Order Hybrid Optimizer for Language Model Fine-Tuning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Models Via Nested Low-Rank Adaptation · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › matrix factorization
singular value decomposition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MoE-SVD: Structured Mixture-of-Experts LLMs Compression via Singular Value Decomposition · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Efficient Low-Order Hybrid Optimizer for Language Model Fine-Tuning · AAAI 2025 |
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation › side information-enhanced sequential recommendation
multimodal sequential recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025 |
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation
cross-platform recommendation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Is Contrastive Learning Necessary? A Study of Data Augmentation vs Contrastive Learning in Sequential Recommendation · WWW 2024 |
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation
data augmentation for sequential recommendation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Is Contrastive Learning Necessary? A Study of Data Augmentation vs Contrastive Learning in Sequential Recommendation · WWW 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SoLA: Leveraging Soft Activation Sparsity and Low-Rank Decomposition for Large Language Model Compression · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Efficient Low-Order Hybrid Optimizer for Language Model Fine-Tuning · AAAI 2025 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025 |
Recommender systems
cold-start recommendation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Is Contrastive Learning Necessary? A Study of Data Augmentation vs Contrastive Learning in Sequential Recommendation · WWW 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
low-rank decomposition · 1.7zeroth-order optimizer · 0.9singular value decomposition · 0.9sensitivity analysis · 0.9re-ranking · 0.9low-rank adaptation · 0.9large vision-language model · 0.9item enhancement · 0.9intra-layer hybrid optimization · 0.9inter-layer hybrid optimization · 0.9first-order optimizer · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9activation sparsity · 0.9data augmentation · 0.8contrastive learning · 0.8benchmarking · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Towards Efficient Low-Order Hybrid Optimizer for Language Model Fine-TuningabstractAs the size of language models notably grows, fine-tuning the models becomes more challenging: fine-tuning with first-order optimizers (e.g., SGD and Adam) requires high memory consumption, while fine-tuning with a memory-efficient zeroth-order optimizer (MeZO) has a significant accuracy drop and slower convergence rate. In this work, we propose a Low order Hybrid Optimizer (LoHO) which merges zeroth-order (ZO) and first-order (FO) optimizers for fine-tuning. LoHO is empowered with inter-layer hybrid optimization and intra-layer hybrid optimization, which boosts the accuracy of MeZO while keeping memory usage within a budget. The inter-layer hybrid optimization exploits the FO optimizer in deep layers and the ZO optimizer in shallow ones, therefore avoiding unnecessary gradient propagation to improve memory efficiency. The intra-layer hybrid optimization updates a proportion of parameters in a layer by the ZO optimizer, and the rest by the FO optimizer, taking advantage of gradient sparsity for high efficiency implementation. Our experimental results across common datasets on different pre-trained backbones (i.e., RoBERTa-large, OPT-13B and OPT-30B) demonstrate that LoHO can significantly improve the predictive accuracy and convergence rate of MeZO, while controlling the memory footprint during fine-tuning. Moreover, LoHO can achieve comparable performance with first-order fine-tuning using substantially fewer memory resources. Minping Chen, You-Liang Huang, Zeyi Wen |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | SoLA: Leveraging Soft Activation Sparsity and Low-Rank Decomposition for Large Language Model CompressionabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various tasks, but the billion-scale parameters pose deployment challenges. Although existing methods attempt to reduce the scale of LLMs, they require either special hardware support or expensive post-training to maintain model quality. To facilitate efficient and affordable model slimming, we propose a novel training-free compression method for LLMs, named “SoLA”, which leverages Soft activation sparsity and Low-rAnk decomposition. SoLA can identify and retain a minority of components significantly contributing to inference, while compressing the majority through low-rank decomposition, based on our analysis of the activation pattern in the feed-forward network (FFN) of modern LLMs. To alleviate the decomposition loss, SoLA is equipped with an adaptive component-wise low-rank allocation strategy to assign appropriate truncation positions for different weight matrices. We conduct extensive experiments on LLaMA-2-7B/13B/70B and Mistral-7B models across a variety of benchmarks. SoLA exhibits remarkable improvement in both language modeling and downstream task accuracy without post-training. For example, with a 30% compression rate on the LLaMA-2-70B model, SoLA surpasses the state-of-the-art method by reducing perplexity from 6.95 to 4.44 and enhancing downstream task accuracy by 10%. Xinhao Huang, You-Liang Huang, Zeyi Wen |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Models Via Nested Low-Rank Adaptation
Lujun Li 0001, Cheng Lin 0001, You-Liang Huang, Wei Li 0286, Jie Zou 0001, Wei Xue 0002, Sirui Han, Yike Guo |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2025 | MoE-SVD: Structured Mixture-of-Experts LLMs Compression via Singular Value DecompositionabstractMixture of Experts (MoE) architecture improves Large Language Models (LLMs) with better scaling, but its higher parameter counts and memory demands create challenges for deployment. In this paper, we present MoE-SVD, a new decomposition-based compression framework tailored for MoE LLMs without any extra training. By harnessing the power of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), MoE-SVD addresses the critical issues of decomposition collapse and matrix redundancy in MoE architectures. Specifically, we first decompose experts into compact low-rank matrices, resulting in accelerated inference and memory optimization. In particular, we propose selective decomposition strategy by measuring sensitivity metrics based on weight singular values and activation statistics to automatically identify decomposable expert layers. Then, we share a single V-matrix across all experts and employ a top-k selection for U-matrices. This low-rank matrix sharing and trimming scheme allows for significant parameter reduction while preserving diversity among experts. Comprehensive experiments on Mixtral, Phi-3.5, DeepSeek, and Qwen2 MoE LLMs show MoE-SVD outperforms other compression methods, achieving a 60% compression ratio and 1.5$\times$ faster inference with minimal performance loss. Wei Li 0286, Lujun Li 0001, Hao Gu 0001, You-Liang Huang, Mark Lee 0001, Wei Xue 0002, Yike Guo |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical StudyabstractAs multimedia content continues to grow on the web, the integration of visual and textual data has become a crucial challenge for web applications, particularly in recommendation systems. Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated considerable potential in addressing this challenge across various tasks that require such multimodal integration. However, their application in multimodal sequential recommendation (MSR) has not been extensively studied. To bridge this gap, we introduce MSRBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to systematically evaluate different LVLM integration strategies in web-based recommendation scenarios. We benchmark three state-of-the-art LVLMs, i.e., GPT-4 Vision, GPT-4o, and Claude-3-Opus, on the next item prediction task using the constructed Amazon Review Plus dataset, which includes additional item descriptions generated by LVLMs. Our evaluation examines five integration strategies: using LVLMs as recommender, item enhancer, reranker, and various combinations of these roles. The benchmark results reveal that 1) using LVLMs as rerankers is the most effective strategy, significantly outperforming others that rely on LVLMs to directly generate recommendations or only enhance items; 2) GPT-4o consistently achieves the best performance across most scenarios, particularly when employed as a reranker; 3) the computational inefficiency of LVLMs presents a major barrier to their widespread adoption in real-time multimodal recommendation systems. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/PALIN2018/MSRBench. Peilin Zhou, Chao Liu 0001, Jing Ren 0010, Xinfeng Zhou, Yueqi Xie, Meng Cao 0002, Zhongtao Rao, You-Liang Huang, Dading Chong, Junling Liu, Jae Boum Kim, Shoujin Wang, Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, Sunghun Kim 0001 |
WWW | 8 |
| 2024 | Is Contrastive Learning Necessary? A Study of Data Augmentation vs Contrastive Learning in Sequential RecommendationabstractSequential recommender systems (SRS) are designed to predict users' future behaviors based on their historical interaction data. Recent research has increasingly utilized contrastive learning (CL) to leverage unsupervised signals to alleviate the data sparsity issue in SRS. In general, CL-based SRS first augments the raw sequential interaction data by using data augmentation strategies and employs a contrastive training scheme to enforce the representations of those sequences from the same raw interaction data to be similar. Despite the growing popularity of CL, data augmentation, as a basic component of CL, has not received sufficient attention. This raises the question: Is it possible to achieve superior recommendation results solely through data augmentation? To answer this question, we benchmark eight widely used data augmentation strategies, as well as state-of-the-art CL-based SRS methods, on four real-world datasets under both warm- and cold-start settings. Intriguingly, the conclusion drawn from our study is that, certain data augmentation strategies can achieve similar or even superior performance compared with some CL-based methods, demonstrating the potential to significantly alleviate the data sparsity issue with fewer computational overhead. We hope that our study can further inspire more fundamental studies on the key functional components of complex CL techniques. Our processed datasets and codes are available at https://github.com/AIM-SE/DA4Rec. Peilin Zhou, You-Liang Huang, Yueqi Xie, Jingqi Gao, Shoujin Wang, Jae Boum Kim, Sunghun Kim 0001 |
WWW | 2 |
| 2023 | StyleTerrain: A novel disentangled generative model for controllable high-quality procedural terrain generation
You-Liang Huang, Xue-Feng Yuan |
Comput. Graph. | 1 |