VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rohil Khare
dblp:360/5142
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Edge and fog computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Edge and fog computing
cloud robotics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FogROS2-Config: A Toolkit for Choosing Server Configurations for Cloud Robotics · ICRA 2024 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
cloud resource management |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FogROS2-Config: A Toolkit for Choosing Server Configurations for Cloud Robotics · ICRA 2024 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
latency-cost tradeoff |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | FogROS2-Config: A Toolkit for Choosing Server Configurations for Cloud Robotics · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pareto frontier analysis · 1.5benchmarking · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | FogROS2-Config: A Toolkit for Choosing Server Configurations for Cloud RoboticsabstractCloud service providers provide over 50,000 distinct and dynamically changing set of cloud server options. To help roboticists make cost-effective decisions, we present FogROS2-Config, an open toolkit that takes ROS2 nodes as input and automatically runs relevant benchmarks to quickly return a menu of cloud compute services that tradeoff latency and cost. Because it is infeasible to try every hardware configuration, FogROS2-Config quickly samples tests a small set of edge-case servers. We evaluate FogROS2-Config on three robotics application tasks: visual SLAM, grasp planning. and motion planning. FogROS2-Config can reduce the cost by up to 20x. By comparing with a Pareto frontier for cost and latency by running the application task on feasible server configurations, we evaluate cost and latency models and confirm that FogROS2-Config selects efficient hardware configurations to balance cost and latency. Videos and code are available on the website https://sites.google.com/view/fogros2-config Kaiyuan Chen 0001, Kush Hari, Rohil Khare, Charlotte Le, Trinity Chung, Jaimyn Drake, Jeffrey Ichnowski, John Kubiatowicz, Kenneth Y. Goldberg |
ICRA | 3 |