Kirti Rajagopalan

dblp:360/5268 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7086-9858ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Environmental and earth informatics · 83% Computational science and engineering · 17%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 31% Segmentation and scene understanding · 26% Graph learning · 26%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.912025
IGraSS: Learning to Identify Infrastructure Networks from Satellite Imagery by Iterative Graph-constrained Semantic Segmentation · IJCAI 2025
Environmental and earth informatics
hydrology
0.812024
Streamflow Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification for Water Management: A Constrained Reasoning and Learning Approach · IJCAI 2024
Environmental and earth informatics › hydrology
streamflow prediction
0.812024
Streamflow Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification for Water Management: A Constrained Reasoning and Learning Approach · IJCAI 2024
Computational science and engineering
uncertainty quantification
0.812024
Streamflow Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification for Water Management: A Constrained Reasoning and Learning Approach · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.522026
ForeSWE: Forecasting Snow-Water Equivalent with an Uncertainty-Aware Attention Model · AAAI 2026
Attention-Based Models for Snow-Water Equivalent Prediction · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › multi-dimensional attention
spatio-temporal attention
0.522026
ForeSWE: Forecasting Snow-Water Equivalent with an Uncertainty-Aware Attention Model · AAAI 2026
Attention-Based Models for Snow-Water Equivalent Prediction · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.312026
ForeSWE: Forecasting Snow-Water Equivalent with an Uncertainty-Aware Attention Model · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.312026
ForeSWE: Forecasting Snow-Water Equivalent with an Uncertainty-Aware Attention Model · AAAI 2026
Environmental and earth informatics
remote sensing
0.312025
IGraSS: Learning to Identify Infrastructure Networks from Satellite Imagery by Iterative Graph-constrained Semantic Segmentation · IJCAI 2025
Environmental and earth informatics › remote sensing
satellite imagery analysis
0.312025
IGraSS: Learning to Identify Infrastructure Networks from Satellite Imagery by Iterative Graph-constrained Semantic Segmentation · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

attention mechanism · 3.5gaussian process · 2.0iterative graph-constrained segmentation · 1.7ground-truth refinement · 1.7machine learning · 1.5constrained reasoning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 ForeSWE: Forecasting Snow-Water Equivalent with an Uncertainty-Aware Attention Model
abstract
Various complex water management decisions are made in snow-dominant watersheds with the knowledge of Snow-Water Equivalent (SWE)---a key measure widely used to estimate the water content of a snowpack. However, forecasting SWE is challenging because SWE is influenced by various factors including topography and an array of environmental conditions, and has therefore been observed to be spatio-temporally variable. Classical approaches to SWE forecasting have not adequately utilized these spatial/temporal correlations, nor do they provide uncertainty estimates --- which can be of significant value to the decision maker. In this paper, we present ForeSWE, a new probabilistic spatio-temporal forecasting model that integrates deep learning and classical probabilistic techniques. The resulting model features a combination of an attention mechanism to integrate spatiotemporal features and interactions, alongside a Gaussian process module that provides principled quantification of prediction uncertainty. We evaluate the model on data from 512 Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) stations in the Western US. The results show significant improvements in both forecasting accuracy and prediction interval compared to state-of-the-art approaches. The results also serve to highlight the efficacy in uncertainty estimates between different approaches. Collectively, these findings have provided a platform for deployment and feedback by the water management community.
Krishu K. Thapa, Supriya Savalkar, Bhupinderjeet Singh, Trong Nghia Hoang, Kirti Rajagopalan, Anantharaman Kalyanaraman
AAAI5
2025 IGraSS: Learning to Identify Infrastructure Networks from Satellite Imagery by Iterative Graph-constrained Semantic Segmentation
abstract
Accurate canal network mapping is essential for water management, including irrigation planning and infrastructure maintenance. State-of-the-art semantic segmentation models for infrastructure mapping, such as roads, rely on large, well-annotated remote sensing datasets. However, incomplete or inadequate ground truth can hinder these learning approaches. Many infrastructure networks have graph-level properties such as reachability to a source (like canals) or connectivity (roads) that can be leveraged to improve these existing ground truth. This paper develops a novel iterative framework IGraSS, combining a semantic segmentation module—incorporating RGB and additional modalities (NDWI, DEM)—with a graph-based ground-truth refinement module. The segmentation module processes satellite imagery patches, while the refinement module operates on the entire data viewing the infrastructure network as a graph. Experiments show that IGraSS reduces unreachable canal segments from ~18% to ~3%, and training with refined ground truth significantly improves canal identification. IGraSS serves as a robust framework for both refining noisy ground truth and mapping canal networks from remote sensing imagery. We also demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of IGraSS using road networks as an example, applying a different graph-theoretic constraint to complete road networks.
Oishee Bintey Hoque, Abhijin Adiga, Aniruddha Adiga, Siddharth Chaudhary, Madhav V. Marathe, S. S. Ravi, Kirti Rajagopalan, Amanda Wilson, Samarth Swarup
IJCAI7
2024 Attention-Based Models for Snow-Water Equivalent Prediction
abstract
Snow Water-Equivalent (SWE)—the amount of water available if snowpack is melted—is a key decision variable used by water management agencies to make irrigation, flood control, power generation, and drought management decisions. SWE values vary spatiotemporally—affected by weather, topography, and other environmental factors. While daily SWE can be measured by Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) stations with requisite instrumentation, such stations are spatially sparse requiring interpolation techniques to create spatiotemporal complete data. While recent efforts have explored machine learning (ML) for SWE prediction, a number of recent ML advances have yet to be considered. The main contribution of this paper is to explore one such ML advance, attention mechanisms, for SWE prediction. Our hypothesis is that attention has a unique ability to capture and exploit correlations that may exist across locations or the temporal spectrum (or both). We present a generic attention-based modeling framework for SWE prediction and adapt it to capture spatial attention and temporal attention. Our experimental results on 323 SNOTEL stations in the Western U.S. demonstrate that our attention-based models outperform other machine-learning approaches. We also provide key results highlighting the differences between spatial and temporal attention in this context and a roadmap toward deployment for generating spatially-complete SWE maps.
Krishu K. Thapa, Bhupinderjeet Singh, Supriya Savalkar, Alan Fern, Kirti Rajagopalan, Anantharaman Kalyanaraman
AAAI5
2024 Streamflow Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification for Water Management: A Constrained Reasoning and Learning Approach
Mohammed Amine Gharsallaoui, Bhupinderjeet Singh, Supriya Savalkar, Aryan Deshwal, Anantharaman Kalyanaraman, Kirti Rajagopalan, Janardhan Rao Doppa
IJCAI6