Despite significant advancements in automated report generation, the opaqueness of text interpretability continues to cast doubt on the reliability of the content produced. This paper introduces a novel approach to identify specific image features in X-ray images that influence the outputs of report generation models. Specifically, we propose Cyclic Vision-Language Manipulator (CVLM), a module to generate a manipulated X-ray from an original X-ray and its report from a designated report generator. The essence of CVLM is that cycling manipulated X-rays to the report generator produces altered reports aligned with the alterations pre-injected into the reports for X-ray generation, achieving the term ``cyclic manipulation''. This process allows direct comparison between original and manipulated X-rays, clarifying the critical image features driving changes in reports and enabling model users to assess the reliability of the generated texts. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that CVLM can identify more precise and reliable features compared to existing explanation methods, significantly enhancing the transparency and applicability of AI-generated reports.

Automated airway segmentation in CT images is crucial for lung diseases' diagnosis. However, manual annotation scarcity hinders supervised learning efficacy, while unlimited intensities and sample imbalance lead to discontinuity and false-negative issues. To address these challenges, we propose a novel airway segmentation model named Dynamical Multi-order Response Network (DMRN), integrating the unsupervised and supervised learning in parallel to alleviate the label scarcity of airway. In the unsupervised branch, (1) we propose several novel strategies of Dynamic Mask-Ratio (DMR) to enable the model to perceive context information of varying sizes, mimicking the laws of human learning vividly; (2) we present a novel target of Multi-Order Normalized Responses (MONR), exploiting the distinct order exponential operation of raw images and oriented gradients to enhance the textural representations of bronchioles. For the supervised branch, we directly predict the final full segmentation map by the large-ratio cube-masked input instead of full input. Ultimately, we verify the method performance and robustness by training on normal lung disease datasets, while testing on lung cancer, COVID-19 and Lung fibrosis datasets. All experimental results have proved that our method exceeds state-of-the-art methods significantly. Code will be released in the future.

Chest X-ray radiographs (CXRs) play a pivotal role in diagnosing and monitoring cardiopulmonary diseases. However, lung opacities in CXRs frequently obscure anatomical structures, impeding clear identification of lung borders and complicating localisation of pathology. This challenge significantly hampers segmentation accuracy and precise lesion identification, crucial for diagnosis. To tackle these issues, our study proposes an unpaired CXR translation framework that converts CXRs with lung opacities into counterparts without lung opacities while preserving semantic features. Central to our approach is the use of adaptive activation masks to selectively modify opacity regions in lung CXRs. Cross-domain alignment ensures translated CXRs without opacity issues align with feature maps and prediction labels from a pre-trained CXR lesion classifier, facilitating the interpretability of the translation process. We validate our method using RSNA, MIMIC-CXR-JPG and JSRT datasets, demonstrating superior translation quality through lower Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) and Kernel Inception Distance (KID) scores compared to existing methods (FID: 67.18 vs. 210.4, KID: 0.01604 vs. 0.225). Evaluation on RSNA opacity, MIMIC acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patient CXRs and JSRT CXRs shows our method enhances segmentation accuracy of lung borders and improves lesion classification, further underscoring its potential in clinical settings (RSNA: mIoU: 76.58% vs. 62.58%, Sensitivity: 85.58% vs. 77.03%; MIMIC ARDS: mIoU: 86.20% vs. 72.07%, Sensitivity: 92.68% vs. 86.85%; JSRT: mIoU: 91.08% vs. 85.6%, Sensitivity: 97.62% vs. 95.04%). Our approach advances CXR imaging analysis, especially in investigating segmentation impacts through image translation techniques. • Unpaired translation removes lung opacities yet keeps key features in X-rays. • Adaptive masks highlight and constrain opacity changes for better interpretability. • Cross-domain alignment reduces artefacts and preserves real diagnostic features. • Experiments show improved image fidelity, segmentation, and lesion classification.