Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhang-Ren Chen

dblp:360/6681 · also Zhangren Chen · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 62% Computational social science and digital humanities · 19% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 19%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › machine learning for healthcare
medical benchmark
0.912025
MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding · ICML 2025
Medical and health informatics › clinical decision-making
medical reasoning
0.912025
MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding · ICML 2025
Medical and health informatics › machine learning for healthcare › medical foundation model
medical large language model
0.812024
UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicine · NeurIPS 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities
preference learning
0.812024
UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicine · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.312025
MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
reasoning evaluation
0.312025
MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
supervised fine-tuning
0.212024
UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicine · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expert review · 1.7data synthesis · 1.7supervised fine-tuning · 1.5reinforcement learning from human feedback · 1.5direct preference optimization · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding
abstract
We introduce MedXpertQA, a highly challenging and comprehensive benchmark to evaluate expert-level medical knowledge and advanced reasoning. MedXpertQA includes 4,460 questions spanning 17 specialties and 11 body systems. It includes two subsets, Text for text evaluation and MM for multimodal evaluation. Notably, MM introduces expert-level exam questions with diverse images and rich clinical information, including patient records and examination results, setting it apart from traditional medical multimodal benchmarks with simple QA pairs generated from image captions. MedXpertQA applies rigorous filtering and augmentation to address the insufficient difficulty of existing benchmarks like MedQA, and incorporates specialty board questions to improve clinical relevance and comprehensiveness. We perform data synthesis to mitigate data leakage risk and conduct multiple rounds of expert reviews to ensure accuracy and reliability. We evaluate 18 leading models on MedXpertQA. Moreover, medicine is deeply connected to real-world decision-making, providing a rich and representative setting for assessing reasoning abilities beyond mathematics and code. To this end, we develop a reasoning-oriented subset to facilitate the assessment of o1-like models.
Yuxin Zuo, Shang Qu, Zhang-Ren Chen, Xuekai Zhu, Ermo Hua, Ning Ding 0002, Bowen Zhou 0002
ICML4
2024 UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicine
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various domains and are moving towards more specialized areas. Recent advanced proprietary models such as GPT-4 and Gemini have achieved significant advancements in biomedicine, which have also raised privacy and security challenges. The construction of specialized generalists hinges largely on high-quality datasets, enhanced by techniques like supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human or AI feedback, and direct preference optimization. However, these leading technologies (e.g., preference learning) are still significantly limited in the open source community due to the scarcity of specialized data. In this paper, we present the UltraMedical collections, which consist of high-quality manual and synthetic datasets in the biomedicine domain, featuring preference annotations across multiple advanced LLMs. By utilizing these datasets, we fine-tune a suite of specialized medical models based on Llama-3 series, demonstrating breathtaking capabilities across various medical benchmarks. Moreover, we develop powerful reward models skilled in biomedical and general reward benchmark, enhancing further online preference learning within the biomedical LLM community.
Sihang Zeng, Ermo Hua, Ning Ding 0002, Zhang-Ren Chen, Zhiyuan Ma 0005, Haoxin Li, Ganqu Cui, Biqing Qi, Xuekai Zhu, Xingtai Lv, Jinfang Hu, Zhiyuan Liu 0001, Bowen Zhou 0002
NeurIPS5