Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kunting Li
dblp:361/0163
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 61% Machine translation · 30% Information extraction and text analysis · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
character-level alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | C-LLM: Learn to Check Chinese Spelling Errors Character by Character · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text correction › spelling correction
chinese spelling check |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | C-LLM: Learn to Check Chinese Spelling Errors Character by Character · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | C-LLM: Learn to Check Chinese Spelling Errors Character by Character · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.8character-level tokenization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | C-LLM: Learn to Check Chinese Spelling Errors Character by CharacterabstractChinese Spell Checking (CSC) aims to detect and correct spelling errors in sentences.Despite Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit robust capabilities and are widely applied in various tasks, their performance on CSC is often unsatisfactory.We find that LLMs fail to meet the Chinese character-level constraints of the CSC task, namely equal length and phonetic similarity, leading to a performance bottleneck.Further analysis reveals that this issue stems from the granularity of tokenization, as current mixed character-word tokenization struggles to satisfy these characterlevel constraints.To address this issue, we propose C-LLM, a Large Language Modelbased Chinese Spell Checking method that learns to check errors Character by Character.Character-level tokenization enables the model to learn character-level alignment, effectively mitigating issues related to character-level constraints.Furthermore, CSC is simplified to replication-dominated and substitutionsupplemented tasks.Experiments on two CSC benchmarks demonstrate that C-LLM achieves an average improvement of 10% over existing methods.Specifically, it shows a 2.1% improvement in general scenarios and a significant 12% improvement in vertical domain scenarios, establishing state-of-the-art performance.The source code can be accessed at https://github.com/ktlKTL/C-LLM. Kunting Li, Liang He 0003, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou 0016 |
EMNLP | 1 |