VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Claudiu Creanga
dblp:361/0685
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-5443-5506ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 67% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 50% Recommender systems · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text simplification
lexical simplification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RALS: Resources and Baselines for Romanian Automatic Lexical Simplification · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
text simplification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RALS: Resources and Baselines for Romanian Automatic Lexical Simplification · EMNLP 2025 |
Recommender systems › personalized ranking
pairwise ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | RALS: Resources and Baselines for Romanian Automatic Lexical Simplification · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | RALS: Resources and Baselines for Romanian Automatic Lexical Simplification · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pairwise ranking approximation · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | The Art That Poses Back: Assessing AI Pastiches After Contemporary Artworks
Anca P. Dinu, Andreiana Mihail, Andra Maria Florescu, Claudiu Creanga |
EvoMUSART | 4 |
| 2025 | RALS: Resources and Baselines for Romanian Automatic Lexical SimplificationabstractWe introduce the first dataset that jointly covers both lexical complexity prediction (LCP) annotations and lexical simplification (LS) for Romanian, along with a comparison of lexical simplification approaches.We propose a methodology for ordering simplification suggestions using a pairwise ranking approximation method, arranging candidates from simple to complex based on a separate set of human judgments.In addition, we provide human lexical complexity annotations for 3,921 word samples in context.Finally, we explore several novel pipelines for complexity prediction and simplification and present the first text simplification system for Romanian. Fabian Anghel, Cristea Petru-Theodor, Claudiu Creanga, Sergiu Nisioi |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2025 | Benchmarking Large Language Models for Biomedical Relation ExtractionabstractExtracting SNP-phenotype associations from biomedical literature is vital but challenging. We benchmarked diverse NLP models, including MLMs, hybrid architectures, and state-of-the-art LLMs (Gemini 2.0, OpenAI O-series, Qwen, Mistral), on the SNPPhenA corpus across three tasks: sentence-level, abstract-level, and association strength classification. OpenAI O1 achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) results using few-shot learning for non-finetuned sentence-level classification (F1 0.89) and established a new SOTA for abstract-level classification (F1 0.82). Association strength classification proved difficult, though fine-tuned Gemini 2.0 Pro performed best (F1 0.60) in the first LLM evaluation of this task. Proprietary LLMs, especially in few-shot (O1) or fine-tuned (Gemini 2.0 Pro) settings, significantly outperformed other models. These findings confrm the power of modern LLMs for genomic knowledge extraction. Claudiu Creanga, Teodor-George Marchitan, Liviu P. Dinu |
KES | 1 |
| 2024 | Fine-Tuning Models for Biomedical Relation ExtractionabstractNext-Generation Sequencing has revolutionized the study of genetic mutations, enabling large-scale investigations into their roles in disease development. However, extracting meaningful insights from the vast amount of biomedical literature remains a complex challenge that cannot be addressed manually. In this paper, we present pre-trained models (PTMs) for the automatic extraction of relations from biomedical text, specifically targeting the variant-phenotype domain. Our evaluation on the SNPPhenA corpus demonstrates that fine-tuning small BERT-based models, particularly DeBERTa, yields strong performance, approaching the current state-of-the-art (SOTA). Additionally, our results indicate that carefully fine-tuning Google’s Gemini Pro 1.0 outperforms the existing SOTA for both sentence-level tasks (where the model processes only the target sentence) and abstract-level tasks (where the model processes the entire abstract). Claudiu Creanga, Liviu P. Dinu, Daniela Gîfu |
KES | 1 |