Shae McFadden

dblp:361/0943 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-0180-2888ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Malware analysis · 58% Security and privacy of machine learning · 42%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Time series and sequential data · 50%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › non-stationary environments
concept drift
1.012026
DRMD: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Malware Detection Under Concept Drift · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
1.012026
DRMD: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Malware Detection Under Concept Drift · AAAI 2026
Malware analysis
malware detection
1.012026
DRMD: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Malware Detection Under Concept Drift · AAAI 2026
Malware analysis
malware classification
0.712023
Poster: RPAL-Recovering Malware Classifiers from Data Poisoning using Active Learning · CCS 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack
0.712023
Poster: RPAL-Recovering Malware Classifiers from Data Poisoning using Active Learning · CCS 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack defense
0.712023
Poster: RPAL-Recovering Malware Classifiers from Data Poisoning using Active Learning · CCS 2023
Malware analysis › malware detection
machine-learning-based malware detection
0.212023
Poster: RPAL-Recovering Malware Classifiers from Data Poisoning using Active Learning · CCS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

active learning · 2.7markov decision process · 2.0deep reinforcement learning · 2.0retraining · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DRMD: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Malware Detection Under Concept Drift
abstract
Malware detection in real-world settings must deal with evolving threats, limited labeling budgets, and uncertain predictions. Traditional classifiers, without additional mechanisms, struggle to maintain performance under concept drift in malware domains, as their supervised learning formulation cannot optimize when to defer decisions to manual labeling and adaptation. Modern malware detection pipelines combine classifiers with monthly active learning (AL) and rejection mechanisms to mitigate the impact of concept drift. In this work, we develop a novel formulation of malware detection as a one-step Markov Decision Process and train a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agent, simultaneously optimizing sample classification performance and rejecting high-risk samples for manual labeling. We evaluated the joint detection and drift mitigation policy learned by the DRL-based Malware Detection (DRMD) agent through time-aware evaluations on Android malware datasets subject to realistic drift requiring multi-year performance stability. The policies learned under these conditions achieve a higher Area Under Time (AUT) performance compared to standard classification approaches used in the domain, showing improved resilience to concept drift. Specifically, the DRMD agent achieved an average AUT improvement of 8.66 and 10.90 for the classification-only and classification-rejection policies, respectively. Our results demonstrate for the first time that DRL can facilitate effective malware detection and improved resiliency to concept drift in the dynamic setting of Android malware detection.
Shae McFadden, Myles Foley, Mario D'Onghia, Chris Hicks, Vasilios Mavroudis, Nicola Paoletti, Fabio Pierazzi
AAAI1
2023 Poster: RPAL-Recovering Malware Classifiers from Data Poisoning using Active Learning
abstract
Intuitively, poisoned machine learning (ML) models may forget their adversarial manipulation via retraining. However, can we quantify the time required for model recovery? From an adversarial perspective, is a small amount of poisoning sufficient to force the defender to retrain significantly more over time?
Shae McFadden, Zeliang Kan, Lorenzo Cavallaro, Fabio Pierazzi
CCS1