Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric Burton Samuel Martin

dblp:361/1076 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0001-7649-1200ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
email classification
0.712023
Poster: Towards a Dataset for the Discrimination between Warranted and Unwarranted Emails · CCS 2023
Network security › content filtering
spam filtering
0.712023
Poster: Towards a Dataset for the Discrimination between Warranted and Unwarranted Emails · CCS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

natural language processing · 1.3machine learning · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Poster: Towards a Dataset for the Discrimination between Warranted and Unwarranted Emails
abstract
In this research, the prevailing issue we address is the over-generalized perspective of spam/ham (non-spam) classification. Despite the intricacies of spam classification, reliance on user feedback may inadvertently skew filters to misclassify legitimate and malicious emails, as users are prone to flag innocuous commercial mail as spam rather than unsubscribing. Current spam datasets have a propensity to include such user-flagged spam which can lead to further misclassification, leading to filters biased against warranted commercial correspondence. Motivated to address this concern, we introduce two new classification categories that delve deeper into the nuances of spam. 'Warranted spam', refers to consensual communications, from a credible source with transparent and safe opt-out mechanisms, and 'unwarranted spam' describes unsolicited messages, often of a malicious nature. Utilizing these classifications, we propose an innovative and dynamic 'warranted spam' dataset that seeks to pave the way for researchers to develop more sophisticated spam filtering techniques. Furthermore, our study delves into pioneering machine learning and natural language processing approaches, harnessing our dataset's potential. The overarching aspiration of our work is to augment online safety, preserve brand integrity, and optimize both the user experience and the efficacy of email marketing campaigns.
Eric Burton Samuel Martin, Hossein Shirazi, Indrakshi Ray
CCS1