Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuyangzi Fu

dblp:362/2265 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0002-8368-0234ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › set recommendation
bundle recommendation
0.812024
MultiCBR: Multi-view Contrastive Learning for Bundle Recommendation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2024
Recommender systems › representation learning for recommendation
contrastive learning for recommendation
0.812024
MultiCBR: Multi-view Contrastive Learning for Bundle Recommendation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 0.8contrastive learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 MultiCBR: Multi-view Contrastive Learning for Bundle Recommendation
abstract
Bundle recommendation seeks to recommend a bundle of related items to users to improve both user experience and the profits of platform. Existing bundle recommendation models have progressed from capturing only user-bundle interactions to the modeling of multiple relations among users, bundles, and items. CrossCBR, in particular, incorporates cross-view contrastive learning into a two-view preference learning framework, significantly improving SOTA performance. It does, however, have two limitations: (1) the two-view formulation does not fully exploit all the heterogeneous relations among users, bundles, and items; and (2) the “early contrast and late fusion” framework is less effective in capturing user preference and difficult to generalize to multiple views. In this article, we present MultiCBR, a novel Multi -view C ontrastive learning framework for B undle R ecommendation. First, we devise a multi-view representation learning framework capable of capturing all the user-bundle, user-item, and bundle-item relations, especially better utilizing the bundle-item affiliations to enhance sparse bundles’ representations. Second, we innovatively adopt an “early fusion and late contrast” design that first fuses the multi-view representations before performing self-supervised contrastive learning. In comparison to existing approaches, our framework reverses the order of fusion and contrast, introducing the following advantages: (1) Our framework is capable of modeling both cross-view and ego-view preferences, allowing us to achieve enhanced user preference modeling; and (2) instead of requiring quadratic number of cross-view contrastive losses, we only require two self-supervised contrastive losses, resulting in minimal extra costs. Experimental results on three public datasets indicate that our method outperforms SOTA methods. The code and dataset can be found in the github repo https://github.com/HappyPointer/MultiCBR .
Yunshan Ma 0002, Yingzhi He, Xiang Wang 0010, Yinwei Wei, Xiaoyu Du 0002, Yuyangzi Fu, Tat-Seng Chua
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.6