VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Danny Wang
dblp:362/6508
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Graph learning · 32% Information extraction and text analysis · 14% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | GOLD: Graph Out-of-Distribution Detection via Implicit Adversarial Latent Generation · ICLR 2025 Text Meets Topology: Rethinking Out-of-distribution Detection in Text-Rich Networks · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GOLD: Graph Out-of-Distribution Detection via Implicit Adversarial Latent Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
text-rich networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Text Meets Topology: Rethinking Out-of-distribution Detection in Text-Rich Networks · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware Fairness · KDD 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › abusive language detection
hate speech detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware Fairness · KDD 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Text Meets Topology: Rethinking Out-of-distribution Detection in Text-Rich Networks · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent generative model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GOLD: Graph Out-of-Distribution Detection via Implicit Adversarial Latent Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hypernetwork · 1.6text augmentation · 0.9latent generative model · 0.9energy-based detection · 0.9edge rewiring · 0.9cross-attention · 0.9adversarial learning · 0.9word embeddings · 0.8adversarial training · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Text Meets Topology: Rethinking Out-of-distribution Detection in Text-Rich NetworksabstractOut-of-distribution (OOD) detection remains challenging in text-rich networks, where textual features intertwine with topological structures.Existing methods primarily address label shifts or rudimentary domain-based splits, overlooking the intricate textual-structural diversity.For example, in social networks, where users represent nodes with textual features (name, bio) while edges indicate friendship status, OOD may stem from the distinct language patterns between bot and normal users.To address this gap, we introduce the Text-TopoOOD framework for evaluating detection across diverse OOD scenarios: (1) attributelevel shifts via text augmentations and embedding perturbations; (2) structural shifts through edge rewiring and semantic connections; (3) thematically-guided label shifts; and (4) domain-based divisions.Furthermore, we propose TNT-OOD to model the complex interplay between Text aNd Topology using: 1) a novel cross-attention module to fuse local structure into node-level text representations, and 2) a HyperNetwork to generate node-specific transformation parameters.This aligns topological and semantic features of ID nodes, enhancing ID/OOD distinction across structural and textual shifts.Experiments on 11 datasets across four OOD scenarios demonstrate the nuanced challenge of TextTopoOOD for evaluating OOD detection in text-rich networks. Danny Wang, Ruihong Qiu, Guangdong Bai, Zi Huang |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | GOLD: Graph Out-of-Distribution Detection via Implicit Adversarial Latent GenerationabstractDespite graph neural networks' (GNNs) great success in modelling graph-structured data, out-of-distribution (OOD) test instances still pose a great challenge for current GNNs. One of the most effective techniques to detect OOD nodes is to expose the detector model with an additional OOD node-set, yet the extra OOD instances are often difficult to obtain in practice. Recent methods for image data address this problem using OOD data synthesis, typically relying on pre-trained generative models like Stable Diffusion. However, these approaches require vast amounts of additional data, as well as one-for-all pre-trained generative models, which are not available for graph data. Therefore, we propose the GOLD framework for graph OOD detection, an implicit adversarial learning pipeline with synthetic OOD exposure without pre-trained models. The implicit adversarial training process employs a novel alternating optimisation framework by training: (1) a latent generative model to regularly imitate the in-distribution (ID) embeddings from an evolving GNN, and (2) a GNN encoder and an OOD detector to accurately classify ID data while increasing the energy divergence between the ID embeddings and the generative model's synthetic embeddings. This novel approach implicitly transforms the synthetic embeddings into pseudo-OOD instances relative to the ID data, effectively simulating exposure to OOD scenarios without auxiliary data. Extensive OOD detection experiments are conducted on five benchmark graph datasets, verifying the superior performance of GOLD without using real OOD data compared with the state-of-the-art OOD exposure and non-exposure baselines. Danny Wang, Ruihong Qiu, Guangdong Bai, Zi Huang |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware FairnessabstractTo counter the side effect brought by the proliferation of social media platforms, hate speech detection (HSD) plays a vital role in halting the dissemination of toxic online posts at an early stage. However, given the ubiquitous topical communities on social media, a trained HSD classifier can easily become biased towards specific targeted groups (e.g.,female andblack people), where a high rate of either false positive or false negative results can significantly impair public trust in the fairness of content moderation mechanisms, and eventually harm the diversity of online society. Although existing fairness-aware HSD methods can smooth out some discrepancies across targeted groups, they are mostly specific to a narrow selection of targets that are assumed to be known and fixed. This inevitably prevents those methods from generalizing to real-world use cases where new targeted groups constantly emerge (e.g., new forums created on Reddit) over time. To tackle the defects of existing HSD practices, we propose Generalizable target-aware Fairness (GetFair), a new method for fairly classifying each post that contains diverse and even unseen targets during inference. To remove the HSD classifier's spurious dependence on target-related features, GetFair trains a series of filter functions in an adversarial pipeline, so as to deceive the discriminator that recovers the targeted group from filtered post embeddings. To maintain scalability and generalizability, we innovatively parameterize all filter functions via a hypernetwork. Taking a target's pretrained word embedding as input, the hypernetwork generates the weights used by each target-specific filter on-the-fly without storing dedicated filter parameters. In addition, a novel semantic gap alignment scheme is imposed on the generation process, such that the produced filter function for an unseen target is rectified by its semantic affinity with existing targets used for training. Finally, experiments are conducted on two benchmark HSD datasets, showing advantageous performance of GetFair on out-of-sample targets among baselines. Tong Chen 0005, Danny Wang, Xurong Liang, Marten Risius, Gianluca Demartini, Hongzhi Yin |
KDD | 2 |