Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johann Hainzinger
dblp:362/7033
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Usable security · 44% Authentication and access control · 44% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usable security › security tool usability
key management usability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Perceptions of Distributed Ledger Technology Key Management - An Interview Study with Finance Professionals · SP 2023 |
Authentication and access control › user authentication
multi-user authentication |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Perceptions of Distributed Ledger Technology Key Management - An Interview Study with Finance Professionals · SP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative interview study · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Perceptions of Distributed Ledger Technology Key Management - An Interview Study with Finance ProfessionalsabstractKey management is an integral part of using distributed ledger technology (DLT). Previous work has primarily focused on key management for single-user scenarios on Bitcoin. Over the last decade, DLT has evolved to commercial and financial sectors; for example, a new German law allows the trading of a variety of financial securities via DLT. Instead of a single-user paradigm, financial institutions follow a multi-user paradigm. Combining multi-user key management with single-user key management solutions leads to unique challenges with usability and security. We extend current research through a two-stage qualitative interview study with 13 finance professionals. We investigate how the technical reality contrasts with perceptions of key management practices in corporate financial organizations. Our interdisciplinary study shows, among other things, that DLT does not meet real-world requirements in this particular domain. Moreover, it introduces additional challenges in terms of authentication and auditing. Our findings suggest that corporate financial institutions strongly support the adoption of blockchain solutions. However, to comply with regulatory and operational requirements, they face additional usability and security challenges, e.g., authentication and access control. Better mechanisms or novel design approaches are required to cover professional environments. This includes how multiple users can access the same assets and approve joint transactions. Carolyn Guthoff, Simon Anell, Johann Hainzinger, Adrian Dabrowski, Katharina Krombholz |
SP | 3 |