Machine Learning (ML) technologies have shown great promise in many areas, but when used without proper oversight, they can produce biased results that discriminate against historically underrepresented groups. In recent years, the software engineering research community has contributed to addressing the need for ethical machine learning by proposing a number of fairness-aware practices, e.g., fair data balancing or testing approaches, that may support the management of fairness requirements throughout the software lifecycle. Nonetheless, the actual validity of these practices, in terms of practical application, impact, and effort, from the developers’ perspective has not been investigated yet. This paper addresses this limitation, assessing the developers’ perspective of a set of 28 fairness practices collected from the literature. We perform a survey study involving 155 practitioners who have been working on the development and maintenance of ML-enabled systems, analyzing the answers via statistical and clustering analysis to group fairness-aware practices based on their application frequency, impact on bias mitigation, and effort required for their application. While all the practices are deemed relevant by developers, those applied at the early stages of development appear to be the most impactful. More importantly, the effort required to implement the practices is average and sometimes high, with a subsequent average application. The findings highlight the need for effort-aware automated approaches that ease the application of the available practices, as well as recommendation systems that may suggest when and how to apply fairness-aware practices throughout the software lifecycle.

To provide a measurable representation of social issues in software teams, the research community defined a set of anti-patterns that may lead to the emergence of both social and technical debt, i.e., “community smells”. Researchers have investigated community smells from different perspectives; in particular, they have analyzed how product-related aspects of software development, such as architecture and introducing a new language, could influence community smells. However, how technical project characteristics may be in relation to the emergence of community smells is still unknown. Different from those works, we aim to investigate how adopting specific programming languages might influence the socio-technical alignment and congruence of the development community, possibly inducing their overall ability to communicate and collaborate, leading to the emergence of social anti-patterns, i.e., community smells. We studied the relationship between the most used programming languages and the community smells in 100 open-source projects on G ITHub. Key results of the study show a low statistical correlation for specific community smells like Prima Donna Effects, Solution Defiance, and Organizational Skirmish, highlighting the fact that for some programming languages, its adoption could not be an indicator of the presence or absence of community smells.

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used as a key component of most software systems, yet serious concerns have been raised about the fairness of ML predictions. Researchers have been proposing novel methods to support the development of fair machine learning solutions. Nonetheless, most of them can only be used in late development stages, e.g., during model training, while there is a lack of methods that may provide practitioners with early fairness analytics enabling the treatment of fairness throughout the development lifecycle. This paper proposes ReFair, a novel context-aware requirements engineering framework that allows to classify sensitive features from User Stories. By exploiting natural language processing and word embedding techniques, our framework first identifies both the use case domain and the machine learning task to be performed in the system being developed; afterward, it recommends which are the context-specific sensitive features to be considered during the implementation. We assess the capabilities of ReFair by experimenting it against a synthetic dataset---which we built as part of our research---composed of 12,401 User Stories related to 34 application domains. Our findings showcase the high accuracy of ReFair, other than highlighting its current limitations.

Machine learning is part of the daily life of people and companies worldwide. Unfortunately, bias in machine learning algorithms risks unfairly influencing the decision-making process and reiterating possible discrimination. While the interest of the software engineering community in software fairness is rapidly increasing, there is still a lack of understanding of various aspects connected to fair machine learning engineering, i.e., the software engineering process involved in developing fairness-critical machine learning systems. Questions connected to the practitioners' awareness and maturity about fairness, the skills required to deal with the matter, and the best development phase(s) where fairness should be faced more are just some examples of the knowledge gaps currently open. In this paper, we provide insights into how fairness is perceived and managed in practice, to shed light on the instruments and approaches that practitioners might employ to properly handle fairness. We conducted a survey with 117 professionals who shared their knowledge and experience highlighting the relevance of fairness in practice, and the skills and tools required to handle it. The key results of our study show that fairness is still considered a second-class quality aspect in the development of artificial intelligence systems. The building of specific methods and development environments, other than automated validation tools, might help developers to treat fairness throughout the software lifecycle and revert this trend.