VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chia-Jen Yeh
dblp:362/8498
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CFEVER: A Chinese Fact Extraction and VERification Dataset · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › fact-checking
fact extraction and verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CFEVER: A Chinese Fact Extraction and VERification Dataset · AAAI 2024 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark dataset |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CFEVER: A Chinese Fact Extraction and VERification Dataset · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
inter-annotator agreement · 1.5dataset construction · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | CFEVER: A Chinese Fact Extraction and VERification DatasetabstractWe present CFEVER, a Chinese dataset designed for Fact Extraction and VERification. CFEVER comprises 30,012 manually created claims based on content in Chinese Wikipedia. Each claim in CFEVER is labeled as “Supports”, “Refutes”, or “Not Enough Info” to depict its degree of factualness. Similar to the FEVER dataset, claims in the “Supports” and “Refutes” categories are also annotated with corresponding evidence sentences sourced from single or multiple pages in Chinese Wikipedia. Our labeled dataset holds a Fleiss’ kappa value of 0.7934 for five-way inter-annotator agreement. In addition, through the experiments with the state-of-the-art approaches developed on the FEVER dataset and a simple baseline for CFEVER, we demonstrate that our dataset is a new rigorous benchmark for factual extraction and verification, which can be further used for developing automated systems to alleviate human fact-checking efforts. CFEVER is available at https://ikmlab.github.io/CFEVER. Ying-Jia Lin, Chia-Jen Yeh, Yi-Ting Li, Yun-Yu Hu, Chih-Hao Hsu, Mei-Feng Lee, Hung-Yu Kao |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2024 | GViG: Generative Visual Grounding Using Prompt-Based Language Modeling for Visual Question Answering
Yi-Ting Li, Ying-Jia Lin, Chia-Jen Yeh, Hung-Yu Kao |
PAKDD (6) | 3 |