Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zebin He
dblp:363/1435
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 60% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 10% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 33% Computer animation and physical simulation · 33% Rendering · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › feature engineering
automated feature engineering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label Tasks · AAAI 2026 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label Tasks · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
automated feature generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Two-Stage Feature Generation with Transformer and Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Two-Stage Feature Generation with Transformer and Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
proximal policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Two-Stage Feature Generation with Transformer and Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing
3d content creation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MaterialMVP: Illumination-Invariant Material Generation via Multi-View PBR Diffusion · ICCV 2025 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › physically-based modeling › material modeling
material generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MaterialMVP: Illumination-Invariant Material Generation via Multi-View PBR Diffusion · ICCV 2025 |
Rendering
physically based rendering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MaterialMVP: Illumination-Invariant Material Generation via Multi-View PBR Diffusion · ICCV 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label Tasks · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pearson correlation · 3.0large language model · 3.0feedback mechanism · 3.0code generation · 3.0transformer · 0.9self-attention · 0.9proximal policy optimization · 0.9multi-view generation · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label TasksabstractExisting feature engineering methods based on large language models (LLMs) have not yet been applied to multi-label learning tasks. They lack the ability to model complex label dependencies and are not specifically adapted to the characteristics of multi-label tasks. To address the above issues, we propose Feature Engineering Automation for Multi-Label Learning (FEAML), an automated feature engineering method for multi-label classification which leverages the code generation capabilities of LLMs. By utilizing metadata and label co-occurrence matrices, LLMs are guided to understand the relationships between data features and task objectives, based on which high-quality features are generated.The newly generated features are evaluated in terms of model accuracy to assess their effectiveness, while Pearson correlation coefficients are used to detect redundancy. FEAML further incorporates the evaluation results as feedback to drive LLMs to continuously optimize code generation in subsequent iterations. By integrating LLMs with a feedback mechanism, FEAML realizes an efficient, interpretable and self-improving feature engineering paradigm. Empirical results on various multi-label datasets demonstrate that our FEAML outperforms other feature engineering methods. Wanfu Gao, Zebin He |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | MaterialMVP: Illumination-Invariant Material Generation via Multi-View PBR Diffusion
Zebin He, Mingxin Yang, Tao Wang 0052, Kaihao Zhang, Guanying Chen, Jie Jiang 0015, Chunchao Guo, Wenhan Luo |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2025 | Two-Stage Feature Generation with Transformer and Reinforcement LearningabstractFeature generation is a critical step in machine learning, aiming to enhance model performance by capturing complex relationships within the data and generating meaningful new features. Traditional feature generation methods heavily rely on domain expertise and manual intervention, making the process labor-intensive and challenging to adapt to different scenarios. Although automated feature generation techniques address these issues to some extent, they often face challenges such as feature redundancy, inefficiency in feature space exploration, and limited adaptability to diverse datasets and tasks. To address these problems, we propose a Two-Stage Feature Generation (TSFG) framework, which integrates a Transformer-based encoder-decoder architecture with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). The encoder-decoder model in TSFG leverages the Transformer’s self-attention mechanism to efficiently represent and transform features, capturing complex dependencies within the data. PPO further enhances TSFG by dynamically adjusting the feature generation strategy based on task-specific feedback, optimizing the process for improved performance and adaptability. TSFG dynamically generates high-quality feature sets, significantly improving the predictive performance of machine learning models. Experimental results demonstrate that TSFG outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of feature quality and adaptability. Wanfu Gao, Zengyao Man, Zebin He, Yuhao Tang, Kunpeng Liu 0001 |
IJCAI | 3 |