Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zebin He

dblp:363/1435 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 60% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 10%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 33% Computer animation and physical simulation · 33% Rendering · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › feature engineering
automated feature engineering
1.012026
The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label Tasks · AAAI 2026
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
1.012026
The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label Tasks · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
automated feature generation
0.912025
Two-Stage Feature Generation with Transformer and Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.912025
Two-Stage Feature Generation with Transformer and Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
proximal policy optimization
0.912025
Two-Stage Feature Generation with Transformer and Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2025
Visual content generation and editing
3d content creation
0.912025
MaterialMVP: Illumination-Invariant Material Generation via Multi-View PBR Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Computer animation and physical simulation › physically-based modeling › material modeling
material generation
0.912025
MaterialMVP: Illumination-Invariant Material Generation via Multi-View PBR Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Rendering
physically based rendering
0.912025
MaterialMVP: Illumination-Invariant Material Generation via Multi-View PBR Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
0.312026
The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label Tasks · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pearson correlation · 3.0large language model · 3.0feedback mechanism · 3.0code generation · 3.0transformer · 0.9self-attention · 0.9proximal policy optimization · 0.9multi-view generation · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label Tasks
abstract
Existing feature engineering methods based on large language models (LLMs) have not yet been applied to multi-label learning tasks. They lack the ability to model complex label dependencies and are not specifically adapted to the characteristics of multi-label tasks. To address the above issues, we propose Feature Engineering Automation for Multi-Label Learning (FEAML), an automated feature engineering method for multi-label classification which leverages the code generation capabilities of LLMs. By utilizing metadata and label co-occurrence matrices, LLMs are guided to understand the relationships between data features and task objectives, based on which high-quality features are generated.The newly generated features are evaluated in terms of model accuracy to assess their effectiveness, while Pearson correlation coefficients are used to detect redundancy. FEAML further incorporates the evaluation results as feedback to drive LLMs to continuously optimize code generation in subsequent iterations. By integrating LLMs with a feedback mechanism, FEAML realizes an efficient, interpretable and self-improving feature engineering paradigm. Empirical results on various multi-label datasets demonstrate that our FEAML outperforms other feature engineering methods.
Wanfu Gao, Zebin He
AAAI2
2025 MaterialMVP: Illumination-Invariant Material Generation via Multi-View PBR Diffusion
Zebin He, Mingxin Yang, Tao Wang 0052, Kaihao Zhang, Guanying Chen, Jie Jiang 0015, Chunchao Guo, Wenhan Luo
ICCV1
2025 Two-Stage Feature Generation with Transformer and Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Feature generation is a critical step in machine learning, aiming to enhance model performance by capturing complex relationships within the data and generating meaningful new features. Traditional feature generation methods heavily rely on domain expertise and manual intervention, making the process labor-intensive and challenging to adapt to different scenarios. Although automated feature generation techniques address these issues to some extent, they often face challenges such as feature redundancy, inefficiency in feature space exploration, and limited adaptability to diverse datasets and tasks. To address these problems, we propose a Two-Stage Feature Generation (TSFG) framework, which integrates a Transformer-based encoder-decoder architecture with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). The encoder-decoder model in TSFG leverages the Transformer’s self-attention mechanism to efficiently represent and transform features, capturing complex dependencies within the data. PPO further enhances TSFG by dynamically adjusting the feature generation strategy based on task-specific feedback, optimizing the process for improved performance and adaptability. TSFG dynamically generates high-quality feature sets, significantly improving the predictive performance of machine learning models. Experimental results demonstrate that TSFG outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of feature quality and adaptability.
Wanfu Gao, Zengyao Man, Zebin He, Yuhao Tang, Kunpeng Liu 0001
IJCAI3